HUMAN DEVELOPMENT, SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT, AND SOCIAL JUSTICE: normativities in dispute
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.9771/ccrh.v38i0.67572Keywords:
Social justice, Global justice, Human development, Sustainable developmentAbstract
This article aims to present and critically examine the normativities, ontologies, and epistemologies of the theories of human development, sustainable development, and social justice, taking as the structuring axis of the discussion the relationship between ideal theory, non-ideal theory, and explanatory theory. The theoretical claim is that comparing these three fields makes it possible to deepen the understanding of each of them and to place them in a relation of theoretical complementarity rather than theoretical competition.
Downloads
References
ADAMS, M. The value of ideal theory. In: MANDLE, J.; ROBERTS-CADY, S. (ed.). John Rawls: debating the major questions. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020, p. 73–86.
ANDERSON, Elizabeth. What is the point of equality? Ethics, [s.l.], v. 109, n. 2, p. 287-337, 1999.
BARRY, Brian. Sustainability and Intergenerational Justice. In: DOBSON, A. (ed.). Fairness and Futurity: Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. p. 93–117.
CANEY, Simon. Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
FORRESTER, Katrina. In the Shadow of Justice: Postwar Liberalism and the Remaking of Political Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.
FREEMAN, Samuel. Rawls. London: Routledge, 2007.
FREEMAN, Samuel. Review of Katrina Forrester: In the Shadow of Justice, Postwar Liberalism and the Remaking of Political Philosophy. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, Sep. 2020.
GARDINER, Stephen M. A Perfect Moral Storm: The Ethical Tragedy of Climate Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon Press, 1984.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.
JONAS, Hans. O princípio responsabilidade: ensaio de uma ética para a civilização tecnológica. Tradução de Marijane Lisboa. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto, 2007.
NUSSBAUM, Martha C. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
NUSSBAUM, Martha C. Creating Capabilites: the human development approach. Cambridge Mass: Belknap Press, 2013.
OHLSSON, Johanna; PRZYBYLINSKI, Stephen. Theorising justice: a primer for social scientists. Bristol: Bristol University Press, 2023.
PARFIT, Derek. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.
POGGE, Thomas. World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002.
POGGE, Thomas. World Poverty and Human Rights. 2. ed. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008.
RAWLS, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.
RAWLS, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
RAWLS, John. Uma teoria da justiça. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2016.
ROLSTON III, Holmes. A new environmental ethics: the next millennium for life on Earth. New York: Routledge, 2011.
SEARLE, John R. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press, 1997.
SEN, Amartya. What Do We Want from a Theory of Justice? The Journal of Philosophy, [s.l.], v. 103, n. 5, p. 215–238, 2006.
SEN, Amartya. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.
SIMMONS, A. John. Ideal and Nonideal Theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, [s.l.], v. 38, n. 1, p. 5–36, 2010.
UNITED NATIONS. Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Report). New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.
UNITED NATIONS. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 3–14 June 1992.
VITA, Álvaro de. Por que uma teoria ideal da justiça? E outros ensaios rawlsianos. Belo Horizonte: Conhecimento, 2023.
WARREN, Mark. “What is political theory/philosophy?” PS: Political Science and Politics, [s.l.], v. 22, n. 3. p. 606-612, 1989.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Todo o conteúdo da revista, exceto onde indicado de outra forma, é licenciado sob uma atribuição do tipo Creative Commons BY.
O periódico Caderno CRH on-line é aberto e gratuito.