DESARROLLO HUMANO, DESARROLLO SOSTENIBLE Y JUSTICIA SOCIAL: normatividades en disputa
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.9771/ccrh.v38i0.67572Palabras clave:
Justicia social, Justicia global, Desarrollo humano, Desarrollo sostenibleResumen
Este artículo tiene por objetivo presentar y problematizar las normatividades, ontologías y epistemologías de las teorías del desarrollo humano, del desarrollo sostenible y de la justicia social, tomando como eje estructurador de la discusión la relación entre teoría ideal, teoría no ideal y teoría explicativa. La apuesta teórica es que la comparación entre estos tres campos permite profundizar la comprensión de cada uno de ellos y situarlos en una relación de complementariedad teórica, en lugar de una relación de competencia.
Descargas
Citas
ADAMS, M. The value of ideal theory. In: MANDLE, J.; ROBERTS-CADY, S. (ed.). John Rawls: debating the major questions. New York: Oxford University Press, 2020, p. 73–86.
ANDERSON, Elizabeth. What is the point of equality? Ethics, [s.l.], v. 109, n. 2, p. 287-337, 1999.
BARRY, Brian. Sustainability and Intergenerational Justice. In: DOBSON, A. (ed.). Fairness and Futurity: Essays on Environmental Sustainability and Social Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999. p. 93–117.
CANEY, Simon. Justice Beyond Borders: A Global Political Theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2005.
FORRESTER, Katrina. In the Shadow of Justice: Postwar Liberalism and the Remaking of Political Philosophy. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2019.
FREEMAN, Samuel. Rawls. London: Routledge, 2007.
FREEMAN, Samuel. Review of Katrina Forrester: In the Shadow of Justice, Postwar Liberalism and the Remaking of Political Philosophy. Notre Dame Philosophical Reviews, Sep. 2020.
GARDINER, Stephen M. A Perfect Moral Storm: The Ethical Tragedy of Climate Change. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. The Theory of Communicative Action. Boston: Beacon Press, 1984.
HABERMAS, Jürgen. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1996.
JONAS, Hans. O princípio responsabilidade: ensaio de uma ética para a civilização tecnológica. Tradução de Marijane Lisboa. Rio de Janeiro: Contraponto, 2007.
NUSSBAUM, Martha C. Women and Human Development: The Capabilities Approach. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2000.
NUSSBAUM, Martha C. Creating Capabilites: the human development approach. Cambridge Mass: Belknap Press, 2013.
OHLSSON, Johanna; PRZYBYLINSKI, Stephen. Theorising justice: a primer for social scientists. Bristol: Bristol University Press, 2023.
PARFIT, Derek. Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1984.
POGGE, Thomas. World Poverty and Human Rights: Cosmopolitan Responsibilities and Reforms. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002.
POGGE, Thomas. World Poverty and Human Rights. 2. ed. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2008.
RAWLS, John. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 1971.
RAWLS, John. Political Liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press, 1993.
RAWLS, John. Uma teoria da justiça. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2016.
ROLSTON III, Holmes. A new environmental ethics: the next millennium for life on Earth. New York: Routledge, 2011.
SEARLE, John R. The Construction of Social Reality. New York: Free Press, 1997.
SEN, Amartya. What Do We Want from a Theory of Justice? The Journal of Philosophy, [s.l.], v. 103, n. 5, p. 215–238, 2006.
SEN, Amartya. The Idea of Justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 2009.
SIMMONS, A. John. Ideal and Nonideal Theory. Philosophy & Public Affairs, [s.l.], v. 38, n. 1, p. 5–36, 2010.
UNITED NATIONS. Our Common Future: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development (Brundtland Report). New York: Oxford University Press, 1987.
UNITED NATIONS. Rio Declaration on Environment and Development. United Nations Conference on Environment and Development, Rio de Janeiro, 3–14 June 1992.
VITA, Álvaro de. Por que uma teoria ideal da justiça? E outros ensaios rawlsianos. Belo Horizonte: Conhecimento, 2023.
WARREN, Mark. “What is political theory/philosophy?” PS: Political Science and Politics, [s.l.], v. 22, n. 3. p. 606-612, 1989.
Descargas
Publicado
Cómo citar
Número
Sección
Licencia

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Todo o conteúdo da revista, exceto onde indicado de outra forma, é licenciado sob uma atribuição do tipo Creative Commons BY.
O periódico Caderno CRH on-line é aberto e gratuito.