DESIGUALDADES GLOBAIS: filiações teóricas e críticas radicais

Autores

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9771/ccrh.v35i0.49137

Palavras-chave:

Desigualdades Globais, Crítica ao Eurocentrismo, Unidade de Análise, Epistemologia, Sociologia Global

Resumo

Este artigo argumenta que a abordagem do sistema-mundo de Immanuel Wallerstein foi fundamental para revelar pontos cegos teóricos e metodológicos da Sociologia e para formular um quadro abrangente para o estudo das desigualdades globais. Ao fazê-lo, antecipou tanto a crítica ao eurocentrismo como ao nacionalismo metodológico, apresentada pelas abordagens transnacionais e pós-coloniais, e os debates sobre o aumento das desigualdades globais em várias décadas. Este artigo liga essa primazia analítica a vários fatores: à mudança metodológica da análise dos sistemas-mundo do Estado-nação para toda a economia-mundo capitalista como uma Sociologia global inicial; e à relação entre a mudança metodológica para a crítica epistemológica e seu papel na abordagem inicial de Wallerstein às desigualdades globais. Finalmente, abordo a relação entre a autodefinição da análise dos sistemas-mundo como forma de protesto contra a ciência social dominante (e não como uma teoria) e as filiações teóricas e políticas com abordagens pós-coloniais e decoloniais, para mostrar como elas contribuíram em conjunto para identificar as desigualdades globais como tema.

Downloads

Não há dados estatísticos.

Referências

BOATCĂ, M. Global Inequalities Beyond Occidentalism. Farnham: Ashgate, 2015.

BRITTEN, N.; HEATH, A. Women, men and social class. Gender,Class and Work, [s. l.], v. 241, p. 46-60, 1983.

CARDOSO, F. H.; VERNE, E. F. Dependencia y desarrollo en América Latina: ensayo de interpretación sociológica. Ciudad de México: Siglo Veintiuno, 1969.

CARDOSO, F. H.; VERNE, E. F. Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.

CONNELL, R. W. Why Is classical theory classical? American Journal of Sociology, Chicago, v. 102, n. 6, p. 1511-1557, 1997.

CONNELL, R. W. Southern theory: the global dynamics of knowledge in the social science. Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin, 2007.

CORONIL, F. Beyond occidentalism: toward nonimperial geohistorical categories. Cultural Anthropology, Hoboken, v. 11, n. 1, p. 51-87, 1996.

DOLLAR, D.; KRAAY, A. Growth is good for the poor. Journal of Economic Growth, New York, v. 7, n. 3, p. 195-225, 2002.

ELWERT, G.; EVERS, H.-D.; WILKENS, W. Die Suche nach sicherheit: kombinierte produktionsformen im sogenannten informellen sektor. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, [s. l.], v. 12, n. 4, p. 281-296, 1983.

EVERS, H.-D. Urban and Rural subsistence production: a theoretical outline. Bielefeld: Fakultät für Soziologie an der Universität Bielefeld, 1981. (Working Paper 2).

FRANK, A.G. The development of underdevelopment. Monthly Review, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 4, p. 17-31, 1966.

FRANK, A.G. Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America. New York: [s. n.], 1967.

GOLDFRANK, W. The intellectual background of Immanuel Wallerstein and his world system. Modern Praxis, [s. l.], p. 206-222, 1988.

GOLDTHORPE, J. H. Women and class analysis: in defense of the conventional view. Sociology, [s. l.], v. 17, p. 465-488, 1983.

GROSFOGUEL, R. Developmentalism, modernity and dependency theory in Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South, Durham, v. 1, n. 2, p. 347-372, 2000.

GUTIÉRREZ RODRIGUEZ, E.; BOATCĂ, M.; COSTA, S. (ed.). Decolonizing European sociology. Farnham: Ashgate, 2010.

KEIM, W. et al. (ed.). Global knowledge production in the social sciences: made in circulation. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014

KOMLOSY, A.; BOATCA, M.; NOLTE, H.-H. Special issue introduction: coloniality of power and hegemonic shifts in the world-system. Journal of World-Systems Research, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 2, p. 309-314, 2016.

KORZENIEWICZ, R. P.; MORAN, T. P. Unveiling inequality: a world-historical perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2009.

MIGNOLO, W.D. Local histories – global designs: coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.

MILANOVIC, B. Global inequality: from class to location, from proletarians to migrants. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2011.

MILANOVIC, B. Global income inequality by the numbers: in history and now – an overview. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2012.

OXFAM. An Economy For the 1%. How Privilege and Power in the Economy Drive Extreme Inequality and How This Can Be Stopped. [S. l.], 2016.(210 Oxfam Briefing Paper). Disponível em: https://www-cdn.oxfam.org/s3fs-public/file_attachments/bp210-economy-one-percent-tax-havens-180116-en_0.pdf. Acesso em: 28 ago. 2020.

PATEL, S. The ISA handbook of diverse sociological traditions. London: Sage, 2010.

PIKETTY, T. Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2013.

QUIJANO, A.; WALLERSTEIN, I. Americanity as a concept, or the Americas in the modern world-system. International Social Science Journal, [s. l.], v. 44, n. 4, p. 549-557, 1992.

RANDERIA, S. Jenseits von Soziologie und soziokultureller Anthropologie: Zur Ortsbestimmung der nichtwestlichen Welt in einer zukünftigen Sozialtheorie. Soziale Welt, [s. l.], v. 50, p. 373-382, 1999.

RAVALLION, M. Inequality is bad for the poor. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2005.

WALLERSTEIN, I. The modern world system: capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the sixteenth century. New York: Academic Press, 1974. V. I.

WALLERSTEIN, I. A theory of economic history in place of economic theory? Revue Économique, Paris, v. 42, n. 2, p. 173, 1991a.

WALLERSTEIN, I. Introduction: Why unthink? In: WALLERSTEIN, I. (ed.). Unthinking social science: the limits of nineteenth-century paradigms. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991b. p. 1-4.

WALLERSTEIN, I. Marx and underdevelopment, in unthinking social science: the limits of nineteenth-century paradigms. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991c.

WALLERSTEIN, I. The modern world-system and evolution. Journal of World-Systems Research, [s. l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 512-522, 1995.

WALLERSTEIN, I. Open the social sciences. Items – Social Science Research Council, New York, v. 50, n. 1, p. 1-7, 1996.

WALLERSTEIN, I. Africa in a capitalist world. In: WALLERSTEIN, I. (ed.). The essential Wallerstein. New York: New Press, 2000a. p. 39-69.

WALLERSTEIN, I. 1968, Revolution in the world-system: theses and queries. In: WALLERSTEIN, I. (ed.). The essential Wallerstein. New York: New Press, 2000b. p. 355-373.

WALLERSTEIN, I. The Bourgeoisie as concept and reality. In: WALLERSTEIN, I. (ed.). The essential Wallerstein. New York: New Press: 2000c. p. 324-343.

WALLERSTEIN, I. The rise and future demise of the world capitalist system. In: WALLERSTEIN, I. (ed.). The essential Wallerstein. New York: New Press, 2000d. p. 71-105.

WALLERSTEIN, I. The essential Wallerstein. New York: New Press, 2000e.

WALLERSTEIN, I. World-systems analysis. In: WALLERSTEIN, I. (ed.). The essential Wallerstein. New York: New Press, 2000f. p. 129-148.

WALLERSTEIN, I.; SMITH, J. Households as an Institution of the World-Economy. In: WALLERSTEIN, I.; SMITH, J. (ed.). Creating and transforming households: the constraints of the world-economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. p. 3-23.

Downloads

Publicado

2022-07-19

Como Citar

Boatcă, M. (2022). DESIGUALDADES GLOBAIS: filiações teóricas e críticas radicais. Caderno CRH, 35, e022012. https://doi.org/10.9771/ccrh.v35i0.49137

Edição

Seção

Dossiê 1