DESIGUALDADES GLOBAIS: filiações teóricas e críticas radicais

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9771/ccrh.v35i0.49137

Palabras clave:

Desigualdades Globais, Crítica ao Eurocentrismo, Unidade de Análise, Epistemologia, Sociologia Global

Resumen

Este artigo argumenta que a abordagem do sistema-mundo de Immanuel Wallerstein foi fundamental para revelar pontos cegos teóricos e metodológicos da Sociologia e para formular um quadro abrangente para o estudo das desigualdades globais. Ao fazê-lo, antecipou tanto a crítica ao eurocentrismo como ao nacionalismo metodológico, apresentada pelas abordagens transnacionais e pós-coloniais, e os debates sobre o aumento das desigualdades globais em várias décadas. Este artigo liga essa primazia analítica a vários fatores: à mudança metodológica da análise dos sistemas-mundo do Estado-nação para toda a economia-mundo capitalista como uma Sociologia global inicial; e à relação entre a mudança metodológica para a crítica epistemológica e seu papel na abordagem inicial de Wallerstein às desigualdades globais. Finalmente, abordo a relação entre a autodefinição da análise dos sistemas-mundo como forma de protesto contra a ciência social dominante (e não como uma teoria) e as filiações teóricas e políticas com abordagens pós-coloniais e decoloniais, para mostrar como elas contribuíram em conjunto para identificar as desigualdades globais como tema.

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Citas

BOATCĂ, M. Global Inequalities Beyond Occidentalism. Farnham: Ashgate, 2015.

BRITTEN, N.; HEATH, A. Women, men and social class. Gender,Class and Work, [s. l.], v. 241, p. 46-60, 1983.

CARDOSO, F. H.; VERNE, E. F. Dependencia y desarrollo en América Latina: ensayo de interpretación sociológica. Ciudad de México: Siglo Veintiuno, 1969.

CARDOSO, F. H.; VERNE, E. F. Dependency and Development in Latin America. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1979.

CONNELL, R. W. Why Is classical theory classical? American Journal of Sociology, Chicago, v. 102, n. 6, p. 1511-1557, 1997.

CONNELL, R. W. Southern theory: the global dynamics of knowledge in the social science. Crows Nest: Allen and Unwin, 2007.

CORONIL, F. Beyond occidentalism: toward nonimperial geohistorical categories. Cultural Anthropology, Hoboken, v. 11, n. 1, p. 51-87, 1996.

DOLLAR, D.; KRAAY, A. Growth is good for the poor. Journal of Economic Growth, New York, v. 7, n. 3, p. 195-225, 2002.

ELWERT, G.; EVERS, H.-D.; WILKENS, W. Die Suche nach sicherheit: kombinierte produktionsformen im sogenannten informellen sektor. Zeitschrift für Soziologie, [s. l.], v. 12, n. 4, p. 281-296, 1983.

EVERS, H.-D. Urban and Rural subsistence production: a theoretical outline. Bielefeld: Fakultät für Soziologie an der Universität Bielefeld, 1981. (Working Paper 2).

FRANK, A.G. The development of underdevelopment. Monthly Review, [s. l.], v. 18, n. 4, p. 17-31, 1966.

FRANK, A.G. Capitalism and underdevelopment in Latin America. New York: [s. n.], 1967.

GOLDFRANK, W. The intellectual background of Immanuel Wallerstein and his world system. Modern Praxis, [s. l.], p. 206-222, 1988.

GOLDTHORPE, J. H. Women and class analysis: in defense of the conventional view. Sociology, [s. l.], v. 17, p. 465-488, 1983.

GROSFOGUEL, R. Developmentalism, modernity and dependency theory in Latin America. Nepantla: Views from South, Durham, v. 1, n. 2, p. 347-372, 2000.

GUTIÉRREZ RODRIGUEZ, E.; BOATCĂ, M.; COSTA, S. (ed.). Decolonizing European sociology. Farnham: Ashgate, 2010.

KEIM, W. et al. (ed.). Global knowledge production in the social sciences: made in circulation. Farnham: Ashgate, 2014

KOMLOSY, A.; BOATCA, M.; NOLTE, H.-H. Special issue introduction: coloniality of power and hegemonic shifts in the world-system. Journal of World-Systems Research, [s. l.], v. 22, n. 2, p. 309-314, 2016.

KORZENIEWICZ, R. P.; MORAN, T. P. Unveiling inequality: a world-historical perspective. New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 2009.

MIGNOLO, W.D. Local histories – global designs: coloniality, subaltern knowledges, and border thinking. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2000.

MILANOVIC, B. Global inequality: from class to location, from proletarians to migrants. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2011.

MILANOVIC, B. Global income inequality by the numbers: in history and now – an overview. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2012.

OXFAM. An Economy For the 1%. How Privilege and Power in the Economy Drive Extreme Inequality and How This Can Be Stopped. [S. l.], 2016.(210 Oxfam Briefing Paper). Disponível em: https://www-cdn.oxfam.org/s3fs-public/file_attachments/bp210-economy-one-percent-tax-havens-180116-en_0.pdf. Acesso em: 28 ago. 2020.

PATEL, S. The ISA handbook of diverse sociological traditions. London: Sage, 2010.

PIKETTY, T. Capital in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, 2013.

QUIJANO, A.; WALLERSTEIN, I. Americanity as a concept, or the Americas in the modern world-system. International Social Science Journal, [s. l.], v. 44, n. 4, p. 549-557, 1992.

RANDERIA, S. Jenseits von Soziologie und soziokultureller Anthropologie: Zur Ortsbestimmung der nichtwestlichen Welt in einer zukünftigen Sozialtheorie. Soziale Welt, [s. l.], v. 50, p. 373-382, 1999.

RAVALLION, M. Inequality is bad for the poor. Washington, DC: The World Bank, 2005.

WALLERSTEIN, I. The modern world system: capitalist agriculture and the origins of the European world-economy in the sixteenth century. New York: Academic Press, 1974. V. I.

WALLERSTEIN, I. A theory of economic history in place of economic theory? Revue Économique, Paris, v. 42, n. 2, p. 173, 1991a.

WALLERSTEIN, I. Introduction: Why unthink? In: WALLERSTEIN, I. (ed.). Unthinking social science: the limits of nineteenth-century paradigms. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991b. p. 1-4.

WALLERSTEIN, I. Marx and underdevelopment, in unthinking social science: the limits of nineteenth-century paradigms. Cambridge: Polity Press, 1991c.

WALLERSTEIN, I. The modern world-system and evolution. Journal of World-Systems Research, [s. l.], v. 1, n. 1, p. 512-522, 1995.

WALLERSTEIN, I. Open the social sciences. Items – Social Science Research Council, New York, v. 50, n. 1, p. 1-7, 1996.

WALLERSTEIN, I. Africa in a capitalist world. In: WALLERSTEIN, I. (ed.). The essential Wallerstein. New York: New Press, 2000a. p. 39-69.

WALLERSTEIN, I. 1968, Revolution in the world-system: theses and queries. In: WALLERSTEIN, I. (ed.). The essential Wallerstein. New York: New Press, 2000b. p. 355-373.

WALLERSTEIN, I. The Bourgeoisie as concept and reality. In: WALLERSTEIN, I. (ed.). The essential Wallerstein. New York: New Press: 2000c. p. 324-343.

WALLERSTEIN, I. The rise and future demise of the world capitalist system. In: WALLERSTEIN, I. (ed.). The essential Wallerstein. New York: New Press, 2000d. p. 71-105.

WALLERSTEIN, I. The essential Wallerstein. New York: New Press, 2000e.

WALLERSTEIN, I. World-systems analysis. In: WALLERSTEIN, I. (ed.). The essential Wallerstein. New York: New Press, 2000f. p. 129-148.

WALLERSTEIN, I.; SMITH, J. Households as an Institution of the World-Economy. In: WALLERSTEIN, I.; SMITH, J. (ed.). Creating and transforming households: the constraints of the world-economy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1992. p. 3-23.

Publicado

2022-07-19

Cómo citar

Boatcă, M. (2022). DESIGUALDADES GLOBAIS: filiações teóricas e críticas radicais. Caderno CRH, 35, e022012. https://doi.org/10.9771/ccrh.v35i0.49137

Número

Sección

Dossiê 1