MARKET, DOMINATION E FREEDOM IN CONTEMPORARY REPUBLICANISM

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9771/ccrh.v37i0.47675

Keywords:

Neo-republicanism, Market, Domination, Freedom, Exit, Voice

Abstract

The article analyzes the uses of the concept of market in the political theory of contemporary republicanism, focusing on the problem of (in) compatibility between market structures and practices and the neo-Roman ideal of freedom as nondomination. In recent literature, three approaches to the problem emerge: 1) pro-market, 2) anti-market and 3) regulated market. While the pro-market approach relies exclusively on “exit” mechanisms to reduce domination in the economic sphere, the anti-market approach recognizes legitimacy only in “voice” mechanisms, resulting in critical atrophy of approach 1 and normative deficiency of approach 2. The article concludes that the regulated market approach, if it is reformulated to understand the structural dimension of domination via the market, offers the best perspective to reconcile criticism and normativity in republican theory, as well as to combine exit and voice in the fight against economic domination.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ricardo Silva, Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina

Professor titular do Departamento de Sociologia e Ciência Política da Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina (UFSC) e bolsista de produtividade em pesquisa do Conselho Nacional de Desenvolvimento Científico e Tecnológico (CNPq) (Nível 1D). É doutor em Ciências Sociais pela Universidade Estadual de Campinas (Unicamp) (1998), foi professor visitante da Universidade de São Paulo (USP) (2012) e pesquisador visitante na Universidade da Califórnia, Berkeley (2005-2006) e na Universidade de Chicago (2013-2014). Publicou inúmeros artigos sobre teoria política em periódicos como Dados, Revista Brasileira de Ciências Sociais, Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, Lua Nova, Brazilian Political Science Review, entre outros. É também autor do livro A ideologia do estado autoritário no Brasil (Chapecó: Argos, 2004).

 

CONTRIBUIÇÃO DE AUTORIA:

Ricardo Silva – Conceitualização. Investigação. Metodologia. Escrita - esboço original e revisão.

References

ANDERSON, Elizabeth. Equality and freedom on workplace democracy: recovering republican insights. Social Philosophy & Policy, [United Kingdom], v. 31, n. 2, p. 48-69, 2015.

BERLIN, Isaiah. Dois conceitos de liberdade. In: BERLIN, Isaiah. Estudos sobre a humanidade: uma antologia de ensaios. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2002. p. 226-272.

BIRNBAUM, Simon; WISPELAERE, Jurgen de. Exit strategy or exit trap?: Basic income and the ‘power to say no’ in the age of precarious employment. Socio-Economic Review, [United Kingdom], v. 19, n. 3, p. 909-927, 2021.

BRYAN, Alexander. The economic implications of republican political thought. 2020. Tese (Dotourado em Filosofia) – School of Law, King’s College, London, 2020. Disponível em: https://kclpure.kcl.ac.uk/portal/en/studentTheses/the-economic-implications-of-republicanpolitical-thought. Acesso em: 26 nov. 2024.

BRYAN, Alexander. The dominating effects of economic crises. Critical Review of International Social and Political Philosophy, [United Kingdom], v. 31, n. 2, p. 884-908, 2021.

CASASSAS, David. La ciudad em llamas: la vigência del republicanismo comercial de Adam Smith. Barcelona: Montecinos, 2010. 465 p.

CASASSAS, David; DE WISPELAERE, Jurgen. Republicanism and the political economy of democracy. European Journal of Social Theory, London, v. 19, n. 2, p. 283-300, 2015.

CICERCHIA, Lillian. Structural domination in the labor market. European Journal of Political Theory, London, v. 21, n. 1, p. 4-24, 2022.

CLAASSEN, Rutger; HERZOG, Lisa. Why economic agency matters: an account of structural domination in economic realm. European Journal of Political Theory, London, v. 20, n. 3, p. 465-485, 2021.

CORVINO, Fausto. Republican freedom in the labor market: exploitation without interpersonal domination. Theoria, [Sweden], v. 66, n 158, p. 103-131, 2019.

DAGGER, Richard. Neo-republicanism and civic economy. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, Thousand Oaks, v. 5, n. 2, p. 151-173, 2006.

GAUS, Gerald. Backwards into the future: neorepublicanism as a postsocialist critique of the market society. Social Philosophy and Policy, [United Kingdom], v. 20, n. 1, p. 59-91, 2003.

GEUNA, Marco. Republicanism and commercial society in the Scottish Enlightenment: the Case of Adam Ferguson. In: GELDEREN. Martin van; SKINNER, Quentin (ed.). Republicanism: a shared European heritage: volume. 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. p. 177-195.

GONZÁLES-RICOY, Iñigo. The republican case for workplace democracy. Social Theory and Practice, Tallahassee, v. 40, n. 2, p. 232-254, 2014.

GOUREVITCH, Alex. From slavery to cooperative commonwealth. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2014. 213 p.

GOUREVITCH, Alex. The limits of a basic income: means and ends of workplace democracy. Basic Income Studies, [United States], v. 11, n. 1, p. 17-28, 2016.

HASAN, Rafeeq. Republicanism and structural domination. Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, [United Kingdom], v. 102, n. 2, p. 292-319, 2021.

HAYEK, Friedrich A. The constitution of liberty. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press, 1960. 576 p.

HIRSCHMAN, Albert. Saída, voz e lealdade. São Paulo: Perspectiva, 1973. 155 p.

HIRSCHMAN, Albert. As paixões e os interesses: argumentos políticos a favor do capitalismo antes de seu triunfo. Rio de Janeiro: Paz e Terra, 1979. 129 p.

IRVING, Sean. Hayek’s neo-roman liberalism. European Journal of Political Theory, London, v. 19, n. 4, p. 553-570, 2020a.

IRVING, Sean. Hayek’s market republicanism: the limits of liberty. Abingdon: Routledge, 2020b. 180 p.

KALYVAS, Andreas; KATZNELSON, Ira. Liberal beginnings: making a republic for the moderns. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007. 191 p.

KIMPELL, Jessica L. Neo-republicanism: Machiavelli’s solutions for Tocqueville’s republic. European Political Science Review, [United Kingdom], v. 1, n. 3, p. 375-400, 2009.

KLEIN, Steven. Fictitious freedom: a Polanyian critique of republican revival. American Journal of Political Science, [United States], v. 61, n. 4. p. 852-863, out. 2017.

LABORDE, Cécile; MAYNOR, John. The republican contribution to contemporary political theory. In: LABORDE, Cécile; MAYNOR, John (ed.). Republicanism and political theory. Oxford: Blackwell, 2008. p. 1-28.

LAIN, Bru. Polanyi’s economic embeddedness, countermovement, and republican poltical economy. Ethics, Politics & Society, [Portugal], v. 1, n. 1, p. 369-402, 2018.

LEIPOLD, Bruno. Citizen Marx: the relationship between Marx and republicanism. 2017. Tese (Doutorado em Politica) – Department of Politics and International Relations, University of Oxford, Oxford, 2017.

LOVETT, Frank. A general theory of domination e justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2010. 273 p.

LOVETT, Frank. Domination and distributive justice. The Journal of Politics, [United States], v. 71, n. 3, p. 817-830, 2009.

LOVETT, Frank; PETTIT, Philip. Neo-republicanism: a normative and institutional research program. Annual Review of Political Science, San Mateo, v. 12, p. 11-29, 2009.

LOVETT, Frank. Republican political economy. In: LOVETT, Frank; SELLERS, Mortimer (ed.). The Oxford handbook of republicanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024.

MACGILVRAY, Eric. The invention of market freedom. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. 205 p.

MANAKUN, Tawan. A republican political economy. 2022. Tese (Doutorado em Filosofia) – School of Social Science, University of Manchester, Manchester, 2022.

MCCORMICK, John P. Machiavellian democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2011. 252 p.

O’SHEA, Tom. Are workers dominated? Journal of Ethics and Social Philosophy, [United States], v. 16, n. 1, p. 611-631, 2019.

PETTIT, Philip. A theory of freedom: from the psychology to the politics of agency. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001. 200 p.

PETTIT, Philip. Freedom in the market. Politics, Philosophy & Economics, [United Kingdom], v. 5, n. 2, p. 131-149, 2006.

PETTIT, Philip. Just freedom: a moral compass for a complex world. New York: Norton & Company, 2014. 258 p.

PETTIT, Philip. On the people’s terms: a republican theory and model of democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. 338 p.

PETTIT, Philip. Recuperar la economía: el mercado como res publica. Revista de Economía Institucional, Bogotá, v. 15, n. 28, p. 367-372, 2013.

PETTIT, Philip. Republicanism: a theory of freedom and government. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1997. 316 p.

POCOCK, John Greville Agard. The machiavellian moment: florentine political thought and the Antlantic Republican tradition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2003. 634 p.

POLANYI, Karl. A grande transformação: as origens da nossa época. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 2000. 349 p.

PREISS, Joshua. Did we trade freedom for credit? Finance, domination, and the political economy of freedom. European Journal of Political Theory, London, v. 20, n. 3, p. 486-509, 2021.

RAVENTÓS, Daniel. Basic income: the material conditions of freedom. London: Pluto Press, 2007. 230 p.

RAWLS, John. Justiça como equidade: uma reformulação. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 2003. 306 p.

ROBERTS, William Clare. Marx’s inferno: the political theory of capital. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2017. 282 p.

ROUSSEAU, Jean-Jaques. O contrato social. 3. ed. São Paulo: Martins Fontes, 1996. 186 p.

ROUSSELIÈRE, Geneviève. Rousseau on freedom in commercial society. American Journal of Political Science, [United States], v. 60, n. 2, p. 352-363, 2016.

SANDEL, Michael J. Democracy’s discontent: America in search of a public philosophy. Cambridge: Harvard Universiy Press, 1996. 417 p.

SAGAR, Paul. Liberty, nondomination, markets. The Review of Politics, [United States], v. 81, n. 3, p. 409-434, 2019.

SHARRATT, Grant M. M. Free at work, free from work: nondomination, unions, and basic income. Journal of Labor and Society, [Netherlands], v. 22, p. 607-620, 2019.

SILVA, Ricardo. Liberdade, desigualdade e dominação: a economia política do neorrepublicanismo. In: MIGUEL, Luis Felipe (org.). Desigualdades e democracia: o debate na teoria política. São Paulo: Ed. Unesp, 2016. 436 p.

SILVA. Ricardo. Entre saída e voz: a renda básica na economia política do neorrepublicanismo. Revista Brasileira de Ciência Política, Brasília, DF, n. 35, p. 1-30, 2021.

SKINNER, Quentin. Liberdade antes do liberalismo. São Paulo: Ed. Unesp. 1999. 112 p.

SMITH, Adam. A riqueza das nações: volume 1. São Paulo: Nova Cultural, 1996, 479 p.

SPITZ, Jean-Fabien. Le marché est-il une instituition republicaine?. Diacrítica, Braga, v. 24, n. 2, p. 165-192, 2010.

SPITZ, Jean-Fabien. Les impasses du républicanisme de marché. Philosophiques, Bruxelles, v. 44, n. 2, p. 383-399, 2017.

TAYLOR, Robert S. Delaboring republicanism. Public Affairs Quarterly, Bowling Green, v. 33, n. 4, p. 265-280, 2019.

TAYLOR, Robert S. Exit left: markets and mobility in republican thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. 130 p.

TAYLOR, Robert S. Market freedom as antipower. American Political Science Review, [United States], v. 107, n. 3, p. 593-602, 2013.

TAYLOR, Robert S. Commercial republicanism. In: LOVETT, Frank; SELLERS, Mortimer (ed.). Oxford Handbook of Republicanism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2024.

THOMAS, Alan. Republic of equals: predistribution and property-owning democracy. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2017. 445 p.

WHITE, Stuart. Recovering republican political economy. Imprints: a journal of analytical socialism, [s. l.], v. 4, n. 3, p. 213-235, 2000.

WHITE, Stuart. The civic minimum: on the rights and obligations of economic citizenship. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2003. 304 p.

WINCH, Donald. Commercial realities, republican principles. In: GELDEREN. Martin van; SKINNER, Quentin (ed.). Republicanism: a shared European heritage: volume 2. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2002. p. 293-310.

WINCH, Donald. Adam Smith’s politics: an essay in historiographic revision. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1978. 204 p.

Published

2024-12-23

How to Cite

Silva, R. (2024). MARKET, DOMINATION E FREEDOM IN CONTEMPORARY REPUBLICANISM. Caderno CRH, 37, e024032. https://doi.org/10.9771/ccrh.v37i0.47675