JATARISHUN: indigenous peasant uprisings of Ecuador and Good Living

Autores/as

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9771/ccrh.v35i0.48997

Palabras clave:

social movements, direct action, indigenous peasant peoples, good living, Ecuador

Resumen

This article analyzes the Indigenous Peasant Movements (IPM) of Ecuador as a social force and political actor. By proposing an alternative to the Ecuadorian crisis based on the Sumak  Kawsay (Good Living) values, the IPM expand democratic spaces and  formulate an extended sense of  citizenship. The text focuses on the  events of the 2019 national strike in  Ecuador, in retrospective dialogue with  previous uprisings. It draws on the  testimonies of the Kayambi people,  collected before and after the strike, in  semi-structured interviews, and  ethnographic work. Results show that  the memory of previous struggles was  an essential motivation for the emergence of the uprisings. Besides,  unity and solidarity among rural actors and other sectors of Ecuadorian  society were the basis for the strike’s  strength and power. Finally, in dialogue with the Emancipatory Rural Politics,  the article contributes to critical  approaches to the role of indigenous  peasant peoples in struggles for life  alternatives.  

Descargas

Los datos de descargas todavía no están disponibles.

Biografía del autor/a

Larissa da Silva Araujo, Institute des Hautes Études Internacionales et du Developpement (Geneva Graduate Institute).

PhD candidate in Anthropology and Sociology at the Geneva Graduate Institute, Switzerland. She works on issues related to systemic alternatives, indigenous and peasant movements, women’s movements, and agroecology. Member of the Collective GRITO, Switzerland. Her most recent publications are: “Prácticas cotidianas agroecológicas hacia el Sumak Kawsay/Buen Vivir en el territorio del Pueblo Kayambi - Cayambe, Ecuador” (2021); “¿Convivencia en armonía? La lucha de las chakareras contra de la violencia de género” (2021).

Ana Tereza Reis da Silva, University of Brasilia (UnB)

Associate Professor 3 at the Faculty of Education, University of Brasilia (UnB), working in the Graduate Program in Education (PPGE) and in the Master in Sustainability with Traditional Peoples and Territories (MESPT), both at UnB. Leader of the Research Group Education, Knowledge and Decolonialities (GPDES/CNPq). Hier most recent publications are: "A diversidade cultural como potencia pedagógica: do encontro à educação intercultural" (2021); "Trajetórias Formativas de Musicistas Negros no Pós-Abolição (1890-1930)", (2022, forthcoming).

Citas

ALVAREZ, S. et al. Cultures of Politics/Politics of Cultures: re-visioning Latin American social movements. Boulder: Westview Press, 1998.

BECKER, M. 2008. Indians and leftists in the making of Ecuador’s modern Indigenous Movements. London: Duke University Press, 2008.

BECKER, M. et al. Historia agraria y social de Cayambe. Quito: Abya-Yala, 2009

BERNSTEIN, H. Food sovereignty via the ‘peasant way’: a skeptical view. The Journal of Peasant Studies, [s. l.], v. 41, n. 6, p. 1031-63, 2014. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2013.852082

BREDA, T. O Equador é verde: Rafael Correa e os paradigmas do desenvolvimento. São Paulo: Editora Elefante, 2011.

CERVONE, E. Long live Atahualpa: indigenous politics, justice and democracy in the Northern Andes. London: Duke University Press. 2009.

COLLOREDO-MANSFELD, R. Fighting like a community: Andean civil society in an era of Indian uprisings. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2009.

CORTEZ, D. Genealogía del “buen vivir” en la nueva constitución ecuatoriana. In: FORNET-BETANCOURT, R. Gutes Leben als humanisiertes Leben: Vorstellungen vom guten Leben in den Kulturen und ihre Bedeutung für Politik und Gesellschaft heute. Studien zur Befreiung und Interkulturalität, Berlin, n. 30, p. 227-248, 2010. Disponível em: https://homepage.univie.ac.at/heike.wagner/SUMAK%20KAWSAY%20EN%20ECUADOR.%20DAVID%20CORTEZ.pdf

CUSICANQUI, S. Un mundo ch’ixi es possible: ensayos desde un presente en crisis. Buenos Aires: Tinta Limón, 2018.

DE LA TORRE, C. In the name of the people: democratization, popular organization, and populism in Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador. Revista Europea de Estudios Latinoamericanos y Del Caribe, [s. l.], n. 95, p. 27-48, 2013. doi: 10.18352/erlacs.9229

DUSSEL, E. Transmodernidade e interculturalidade: interpretação a partir da filosofia da libertação. Revista Sociedade e Estado, Brasília, DF, v. 31, n. 1, p. 51-73, 2016. Dossiê: Decolonialidade e Perspectiva Negra.

ECKSTEIN, S. et al. Struggles for social rights in Latin America. Nova York: Routledge, 2002.

GOMES, N. O movimento negro educador: saberes construídos nas lutas por emancipação. Petrópolis: Vozes, 2017.

GUERRERO, A. El levantamiento indígena nacional de 1994: discurso y representación política en Ecuador. Nueva Sociedade, [s. l.], n. 142, p. 32-43, mar.-abr. 1996.

HENDERSON, T. State-peasant movement relations and the politics of food sovereignty in Mexico and Ecuador. The Journal of Peasant Studies, [s. l.], v. 44, n. 1, p. 33-55, 2017. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2016.1236024

HIDALGO-CAPITÁN, A. et al. Genealogy of Latin American good living (buen vivir): the (Triune) good living and its diverse intellectual wellsprings. In: CARBONIER, G. (ed.). Alternative pathways to sustainable development: lessons from Latin America. Leiden: Brill,, 2017. v. 9, p. 23-50.

HOBSBAWM, E. The age of extremes: the short twentieth century 1914-1991. London: Abacus, 1995.

INUCA LECHÓN, J. Genealogía de Alli Kawsay – Sumak Kawsay (Vida Buena – Vida Hermosa) de Las Organizaciones Kichwas del Ecuador desde mediados siglo XX. Latin American and Caribbean Ethnic Studies, [s. l.], v. 12, n. 2, p. 155-176, 2017.

JAMESON, K. P. The indigenous movement in Ecuador: the struggle for a plurinational state. Latin American Perspectives, Thousand Oaks, v. 38, n. 1, p. 63-73, 2011. doi: 10.1177/0094582X10384210

JOHNSTON, H. et al. Latin American social movements: globalization, democratization and transnational networks. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield, 2006.

KAUFFMAN, C. et al. Scaling up buen vivir: globalizing local environmental governance from Ecuador. Global Environmental Politics, Cambridge, v. 14, n. 1, p. 40-58, 2014.

LEÓN GALARZA, N. Ecuador – la cara oculta de la crisis: ideología, identidades políticas y protesta en el fin del siglo. Buenos Aires: Clacso, 2009.

LEÓN TRUJILLO, J. Las organizaciones indígenas y el gobierno de Rafael Correa. Íconos – Revista de Ciencias Sociales, Quito, n. 37, p. 3-23, 2010.

LUCERO, J. A. Struggles of Voice: the politics of indigenous representations in the Andes. Pittsburg: University of Pittsburg Press, 2008.

MARTÍNEZ NOVO, C. Undoing multiculturalism: resources extractions and indigenous rights in Ecuador. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2021.

MENASCHE , R. et al. O lugar da cultura no debate sobre segurança alimentar e nutricional: um olhar a partir de Moçambique. Vivência: Revista de Antropologia, Natal, v. 1, n. 54, p 192-202, maio 2020.

MINISTERIO DE EDUCACIÓN ECUADOR. Kichwa Yachakukkunapa Shimiyuk Kamu: Kichwa-Castellano. Quito: Ministerio de Educación Ecuador, 2009.

MILANEZ, F. et al. Existência e diferença: o racismo contra os ovos indígenas. Revista de Direito e Práxis, Rio de Janeiro, v. 10, n. 3, p. 2161-2181, 2019.

MULLO LÓPEZ, A. et al. Movimentos indígenas do equador: entre a ação coletiva e a ação conectiva. Brazilian Journalism Research, Brasília, DF, v. 17, n. 1, p. 90-117, 2020. doi: 10.25200/BJR.v17n1.2021.1334.

MUNDURUKU, D. O caráter educativo do movimento indígena brasileiro (1970-1990). São Paulo: Paulinas, 2012.

PAREDES, B. (ed.). O mundo indígena na América Latina: olhares e perspectivas. São Paulo: Edusp, 2018.

QUIJANO, A. Colonialidade do poder, eurocentrismo e América Latina. In: LANDER, E. (org). A colonialidade do saber: eurocentrismo e Ciências Sociais. Perspectivas latino-americanas. Buenos Aires: Clacso, 2005. p.227-278

QUIJANO, A. Outro horizonte de sentido histórico. América Latina en Movimiento, Quito, n. 441, 2009. Disponível em: https://www.alainet.org/es/articulo/141203. Acesso em: 22 mar. 2022.

QUIJANO, A. “Raza”, “Etnia” y “Nación” em Mariátegui: cuestiones abiertas. In: QUIJANO, A. Cuestiones y horiontes. Buenos Aires: Clacso, 2014. p. 758-775.

RADCLIFFE, S. Dilemmas of difference: indigenous women and the limits of postcolonial development policy. Durham: Duke University Press, 2015.

SANTOS, F.; SCHWARCZ, L. Indígenas e africanos. In: LILIAN, S. Dicionário da escravidão e da liberdade. São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 2019. p. 260-267.

SCOTT, J. C. The moral economy of the peasant: rebellion and subsistence in Southeast Asia.: Yale University Press, 1976.

SCOTT, J. C. Weapons of the weak: everyday forms of peasant resistance. London: Yale University Press, 1985.

SEGATO, R. Identidades políticas/alteridades históricas: uma crítica a las certezas del pluralismo global. Anuário Antropológico, Brasília, DF, v. 22, n. 1, p. 36, 2018.

SEGATO, R. Crítica da colonialidade em oito ensaios: uma antropologia por demanda. Rio de Janeiro: Bazar do Tempo, 2021.

TILLY, C. Popular contention in Great Britain, 1758-1834. London: Paradigm Publishers, 2005.

TILZEY, M. Authoritarian populism and neo-extractivism in Bolivia and Ecuador: the unresolved agrarian question and prospects for food security as counter-hegemony. The Journal of Peasant Studies, [s. l.], v. 46, n. 3, p. 626-652, 2019. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2019.1584191

VAN STEKELENBURG, J. et al. The social psychology of the protest. Current Sociology Review Article, Thousand Oaks, n. 61, p. 886-905, 2013.

VAZAK, K. A 30-year struggle: the sustained efforts to give force of law to the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. The Unesco Courier, [s. l.], v. 30, n. 11, p. 28-29, 1977.

Descargas

Publicado

2022-06-07

Cómo citar

da Silva Araujo, L. ., & Reis da Silva, A. T. . (2022). JATARISHUN: indigenous peasant uprisings of Ecuador and Good Living. Caderno CRH, 35, e022005. https://doi.org/10.9771/ccrh.v35i0.48997

Número

Sección

Dossiê 1