Trademark as Intellectual Property Asset Protection Instrument in the Universities: bibliometrics review

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9771/cp.v16i5.51500

Keywords:

University, Trademark, Knowledge Protection.

Abstract

The approach of this article cute around three magnitudes: higher education institutions, in particular universities, as a driving agent for knowledge, innovation and the generation of economic development; Intellectual Property (IP), as a strategic element in the protection of assets; and trademark registration, as the most used IP instrument in the world. This research seeks to find scientific elements capable of evidencing and/or understanding how trademark registration is used by universities as mechanisms to protect IP assets, being these products and/or services. To this end, exploratory research with a qualitative-quantitative approach was used, by means of bibliometric prospection in the Scopus research base. The result found indicates that this theme is little studied, for having few publications and low interaction in the scientific environment, despite being a relevant theme in the IP universe.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Marcos Augusto Oliveira Sales, Federal University of Recôncavo da Bahia, Amargosa, BA, Brazil

MBA in Business Management from Fundação Getúlio Vargas in 2015.

Edilson Araújo Pires, Federal University of Recôncavo da Bahia, Santo Antônio de Jesus, BA, Brazil

Doctor and Master in Intellectual Property Science from the Federal University of Sergipe (UFS), Bachelor in Business Administration (UNIJORGE), Degree in History from the State University of Bahia (UNEB). Business consultant, Professor of the Professional Master's Degree in Intellectual Property and Technology Transfer for Innovation (PROFNIT) at the Federal University of Recôncavo da Bahia (UFRB). Creation and Innovation Coordinator at UFRB. Director of the Recôncavo Technology-Based Business Incubator (SEIVA). It has more than 35 scientific publications including articles and book chapters. As an inventor, he has 8 required patents and a Trademark registered with the INPI. He has provided consultancy in the writing of more than 50 patent applications and in the registration of more than 120 Trademarks. It is certified by national and international agencies such as the National Institute of Industrial Property, FORTEC, NIT-NE Network, SEBRAE and World Intellectual Property Organization, with additional training in Project Management, Entrepreneurship, Management of Innovation Agencies, Structuring of NITs and Patents and Priority Search.

References

CLARIVATE. Journal Citation Reports: Reference Guide. [S.l.], 2022. Disponível em: https://clarivate.com/wp-content/uploads/dlm_uploads/2022/06/JCR-2022-Reference-Guide.pdf. Acesso em: 21 set. 2022.

CWTS – CENTRE FOR SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY STUDIES. VOSviewer Visualizing Scientific Landscapes. [S.l.: s.n.], 2022.

ELSEVIER. Soluções Scopus. [S.l.], 2022. Disponível em: https://www.elsevier.com/pt-br/solutions/scopus. Acesso em: 21 set. 2022.

FREIRE, Estevão. Conceituação de Tipos e Metodologias de Pesquisa. In: SILVA, Glória M. M.; QUINTELLA, Cristina M. (org.). Metodologia da Pesquisa Científico-Tecnológica e Inovação. Salvador - Bahia: IFBA, 2021. p. 1-326. (Coleção Profnit, v. 1). E-book. Disponível em: http://www.profnit.org.br/pt/livros-profnit/. Acesso em: 24 set. 2022.

ICC – INTERNATIONAL CHAMBER OF COMMERCE. Guia de Propriedade Intelectual da ICC. Paris: ICC, 2020. Disponível em: https://www.iccbrasil.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/09/ip-roadmap-2020.pdf. Acesso em: 15 jul. 2022.

MEDEIROS FILHO, Adonis Reis de; RUSSO, Suzana Leitão. Marcas como um indicador: revisão sistemática e análise bibliométrica da literatura. Biblios: Journal of Librarianship and Information Science, [s.l.], v. 71, n. 71, p. 50-67, 2018. Disponível em: http://biblios.pitt.edu/ojs/index.php/biblios/article/view/464. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2022.

OECD – ORGANISATION FOR ECONOMIC CO-OPERATION AND DEVELOPMENT; IBD – INTER-AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT BANK. Innovative and Entrepreneurial Universities in Latin America. Paris: OECD Publishing, 2022. (OECD Skills Studies). E-book. Disponível em: https://www.oecd-ilibrary.org/education/innovative-and-entrepreneurial-universities-in-latin-america_ca45d22a-en. Acesso em: 10 ago. 2022.

OLIVEIRA, Marta Olivia Rovedder de; LUCE, Fernando Bins. O Valor da Marca: Conceitos, Abordagens e Estudos no Brasil. REAd. Revista Eletrônica de Administração (Porto Alegre), [s.l.], v. 17, n. 2, p. 502-529, 2011. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1413-23112011000200008&lng=pt&tlng=pt. Acesso em: 10 jun. 2022.

PUC-RS. Brasil é o 13o do ranking mundial em produção científica. [S.l.], 2022. Disponível em: https://www.pucrs.br/soupucrs-pesquisador/brasil-e-o-13o-do-ranking-mundial-em-producao-cientifica/#:~:text=Atualmente%2C%20o%20Brasil%20est%C3%A1%20em,atendidos%20com%20bolsas%20em%202019. Acesso em: 29 set. 2022.

ROCHA, Clarice Monteiro; SILVA, Paula Tereza de Souza e. Análise do Registro e Gestão de Marcas da Empresa Brasileira de Pesquisa Agropecuária. Cadernos de Prospecção, Salvador, v. 15, n. 3, p. 723-737, 2022. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/nit/article/view/47172. Acesso em: 13 jun. 2022.

ROOKSBY, J. H.; COLLINS, C. S. Trademark trends and brand activity in higher education. Review of Higher Education, [s.l.], v. 40, n. 1, p. 33-61, 2016. Disponível em: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84988470744&doi=10.1353%2frhe.2016.0037&partnerID=40&md5=73895f0133b8d4be945def1f0e9ea11c. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

SOARES, Alessandra do Valle Abrahão et al. Transferência de Tecnologia da Universidade para o Mercado: estudo de caso de patente de processo de reciclagem de filtros de cigarro. Cadernos de Prospecção, Salvador, v. 15, n. 2, p. 396-410, 2022. Disponível em: https://periodicos.ufba.br/index.php/nit/article/view/46876. Acesso em: 22 ago. 2022.

SQUICCIARINI, M.; MILLOT, V.; DERNIS, H. Universities’ trademark patterns and possible determinants. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, [s.l.], v. 21, n. 5-6, p. 473-504, 2012. Disponível em: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-84864347752&doi=10.1080%2f10438599.2012.656526&partnerID=40&md5=144f8f79bf5e1df7e845997b03af002e. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

THOMAZ, Petronio Generoso; ASSAD, Renato Samy; MOREIRA, Luiz Felipe P. Uso do Fator de impacto e do índice H para avaliar pesquisadores e publicações. Arquivos Brasileiros de Cardiologia, [s.l.], v. 96, n. 2, p. 90-93, 2011. Disponível em: http://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0066-782X2011000200001&lng=pt&nrm=iso&tlng=pt. Acesso em: 17 jun. 2022.

VAN ECK, Nees Jan; WALTMAN, Ludo. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics, [s.l.], v. 84, n. 2, p. 523-538, 2010.

WIPO – WORLD INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY ORGANIZATION. Global Innovation Index 2022: What is the future of innovation-driven growth? 15. ed. Genebra: WIPO, 2022. Disponível em: https://www.wipo.int/edocs/pubdocs/en/wipo-pub-2000-2022-section1-en-gii-2022-at-a-glance-global-innovation-index-2022-15th-edition.pdf. Acesso em: 5 out. 2022.

Published

2023-07-01

How to Cite

Sales, M. A. O., & Pires, E. A. . (2023). Trademark as Intellectual Property Asset Protection Instrument in the Universities: bibliometrics review. Cadernos De Prospecção, 16(5), 1462–1479. https://doi.org/10.9771/cp.v16i5.51500

Issue

Section

Propriedade Intelectual, Inovação e Desenvolvimento