Proposal of Instruments for Minimum Management of Technological Innovation in Home Appliance Industries

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9771/cp.v13i3.32762

Keywords:

Linha Branca, Gerenciamento de Projetos, PMBOK.

Abstract

The ability to adapt to the ever-changing marketplace is a factor of increasing competitiveness in the consumer goods industries, however the risks and uncertainties inherent in innovation are contrary to their need for security, predictability and control. This study proposes a new approach to technological innovation through the adoption of a set of instruments that represent a minimum management of innovation processes in order to minimize uncertainties, failures and their financial impacts without requiring excessively new approaches from companies. A bibliographic research about this problem was carried through and interview with managers of the main national white line companies and study of their processes, after presenting the components of the proposed methodology. The study suggests that an accessible approach could enable technological innovation and promote the strengthening of national industry.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Robinson Aurélio Miolo, Instituto Federal do Ceará

Design and Technological Innovation Manager at Esmaltec Eletrodomésticos

References

AAGAARD, A.; GERTSEN, F. Supporting Radical Front End Innovation: perceived key factors of pharmaceutical innovation. Wiley: Creativity & Innovation Management, [S.l.], v. 20, n. 4, p. 330-346, 2011. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8691.2011.00609.x. Acesso em: 1º ago. 2019.

CHRISTENSEN, Clayton M. The Innovator’s Dilemma: When New Technologies Cause Great Firms to Fail. Cambridge: Harvard Business School Press, 1997.

CLARK, K. B.; WHEELWRIGHT, S. C. Managing New Product and Process Development. New York: The Free Process, 1993.

COOPER, R. Winningat New Products: accelerating the Process From Idea to Launch. Cambridge: Perseus, 1993.

DAVIDSEN, B. A.; FRANCIS, T. Innovation Practice: 100 Years Anniversary. Telektronikk, [S.l.], n. 2, 2004.

ETZKOWITZ, Henry; ZHOU, Chunyan. Hélice Tríplice: inovação e empreendedorismo universidade-indústria-governo. Scielo – Estudos Avançados, [S.l.], v. 31, n. 90, may-aug. 2017.

FERREIRA, Maraísa Angélica D. et al. A importância do planejamento estratégico para o crescimento das empresas. Maringá Management: Revista de Ciências Empresariais, [S.l.], v. 2, n. 1, p. 34-39, jan.-jun. 2005.

GAO – US GOVERNMENT ACCOUNTABILITY OFFICE. Technology Readiness Assessment Guide: Best Practices for Evaluating the Readiness of Technology for Use in Acquisition Programs and Projects, 2016.

GIL, Antonio Carlos. Como elaborar projetos de pesquisa. 4. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2002.

GIL, Antonio Carlos. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. 6. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2008.

GOVINDARAJAN, Vijay; TRIMBLE, Chris. The Other Side of Innovation: Solving the Execution Challenge. Brighton: Harvard Business Review Press, 2010.

HAMEL, Gary. Competindo pelo futuro: estratégias inovadoras para obter o controle do seu setor e criar os mercados de amanhã. 20. ed. Rio de Janeiro: Elsevier, 2005.

HOWIESON, Susannah V. et al. Department of Energy Technology Maturation Programs. US Institute of Defense Analyses – IDA: Science & Technology Policy Institute, 2013.

ISO – INTERNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR STANDARDIZATION. ISO 16290:2013 – Space systems - Definition of the Technology Readiness Levels (TRLs) and their criteria of assessment. 2013.

MATTOS, P.; LINCOLN, C. L.: A Entrevista Não-estruturada como Forma de Conversação: Razões e Sugestões para sua Análise. Revista Adm. Pública, [S.l.], v. 39, n. 4, p. 823-847, jul.-ago. 2005.

MEYER, M. H. Revitalize your Product Lines through Continuos Platform Renewal. Research Technology Management, [S.l.], v. 40, n. 2, 1997.

MORESI, Eduardo A. D. et al. Análise de níveis de prontidão: uma proposta para empresas nascentes. Atas: Investigação Qualitativa em Engenharia e Tecnologia, 2017. Disponível em: https://proceedings.ciaiq.org/index.php/ciaiq2017/article/view/1127. Acesso em: 1º ago. 2019.

OCDE – ORGANIZAÇÃO PARA A COOPERAÇÃO E DESENVOLVIMENTO ECONÔMICO. Manual de Oslo. 3. ed. [S.l.]: OCDE, 2005.

OLIVEIRA, Djalma Pinho Rebouças de. Planejamento Estratégico: conceitos, metodologias e práticas. 16. ed. São Paulo: Atlas, 2001.

PMI – PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE. Guia PMBOK. 4. ed. Pennsylvania: [s.n.], 2008.

PMI – PROJECT MANAGEMENT INSTITUTE. The Standard for Portfolio Management. 4. ed. Pennsylvania: [s.n.], 2017.

QUINTELLA, Cristina M. et al. PROFNIT, Prospecção Tecnológica – Maturidade Tecnológica: níveis de prontidão TRL. Salvador: FORTEC; IFBA, 2019. v. 2.

REID, S. E.; BRENTANI, U. The Fuzzy Front end of new product development for discontinuous innovations: a theoretical model. Wiley: Journal of Product Innovation Management, [S.l.], v. 21, n. 3, p. 170-184, 2004. Disponível em: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0737-6782.2004.00068.x. Acesso em: 1º ago. 2019.

SAATY, T. L. How to Make a Decision: The Analytic Hierarchy Process. European journal of operational research, [S.l.], v. 48, n. 1, p. 9-26, 1990.

SMITH, P. G.; REINERTSEN, D. G. Shortening the Product Development Cycle. Research-Technology Management, [S.l.], p. 44-49, maio-junho, 1992.

TORRES, Laura B.; BRESSIANI, Tamires P.; SEVERO, Eliana A. A inovação como fonte para vantagem competitiva nas organizações: uma revisão sistemática da literatura. Revista Geintec, Aracaju, v. 7, n. 4, p. 4.028-4.043, out.-nov.-dez. 2017.

US DEPARTMENT OF DEFENSE. Office of the Director Defense Research and Engineering. Technology Readiness Assessment (TRA) Deskbook. Washington D. C, 2009.

US DEPARTMENT OF ENERGY. Office of Environmental Management. Standard Review Plan (SRP): Technology readiness assessment report. Washington D. C, 2010.

Published

2020-05-29

How to Cite

Miolo, R. A., Rodrigues, A. W. de O., Araújo, A. L. C. de, & Carvalho, T. V. (2020). Proposal of Instruments for Minimum Management of Technological Innovation in Home Appliance Industries. Cadernos De Prospecção, 13(3), 635. https://doi.org/10.9771/cp.v13i3.32762

Issue

Section

Propriedade Intelectual, Inovação e Desenvolvimento