Exploring Knowledge Management in Innovation Ecosystems: a scientific mapping
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.9771/cp.v17i5.59124Keywords:
Knowledge Management, Innovation Ecosystem, Scientific Mapping.Abstract
This study aims to map the scientific production in the field of knowledge management in innovation ecosystems, using a bibliometric analysis for this. Data were collected from the Web of Science and Scopus platforms and analyzed with the support of the RStudio and Biblioshiny software tools. The analysis revealed a consistent growth in scientific production in recent years. The countries Italy and China are the leaders in publications. The journal Technological Forecasting and Social Change has the highest number of published articles. In addition, the study presents nine relevant research themes and seven trending themes for the investigated field.
Downloads
References
ABDULKADER, Bisan et al. Aligning firm’s value system and open innovation: a new framework of business process management beyond the business model innovation. Business Process Management Journal, [s.l.], v. 26, n. 5, p. 999-1.020, 2020.
ADNER, Ron; KAPOOR, Rahul. Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, [s.l.], v. 31, n. 3, p. 306-333, 2010.
ALSHATER, Muneer M. et al. Islamic accounting research between 1982 and 2020: a hybrid review. Journal of Islamic Accounting and Business Research, [s.l.], v. 13, n. 8, p. 1.176-1.196, 2022.
ARDITO, Lorenzo et al. The role of universities in the knowledge management of smart city projects. Technological forecasting and social change, [s.l.], v. 142, p. 312-321, 2019.
ARIA, Massimo; CUCCURULLO, Corrado. Bibliometrix: uma ferramenta R para análise abrangente de mapeamento científico. Journal of Informetrics, [s.l.], v. 11, n. 4, p. 959-975, 2017.
BACON, Emily; WILLIAMS, Michael D.; DAVIES, Gareth H. On the Combinatory Nature of Knowledge Transfer Conditions: A Mixed Method Assessment. Information Systems Frontiers, [s.l.], v. 25, n. 3, p. 1.039-1.061, 2023.
BACON, Emily; WILLIAMS, Michael D.; DAVIES, Gareth H. Recipes for success: Conditions for knowledge transfer across open innovation ecosystems. International Journal of Information Management, [s.l.], v. 49, p. 377-387, 2019.
BIBLIOSHINY. O aplicativo brilhante para quem não precisa de programação. 2023. Disponível em: https://www.bibliometrix.org/home/index.php/layout/biblioshiny. Acesso em^30. jan. 2024.
BIZAGI MODELER. Software Gratuito de Mapeamento e Modelagem de Processos de Negócio. 2024. Disponível em: https://www.bizagi.com/pt/plataforma/modeler. Acesso em: 30 jan. 2024.
BOISOT, Max H. Is your firm a creative destroyer? Competitive learning and knowledge flows in the technological strategies of firms. Research Policy, [s.l.], v. 24, n. 4, p. 489-506, 1995.
BROADUS, R. N. Toward a definition of “bibliometrics”. Scientometrics, [s.l.], v. 12, n. 5-6, p. 373-379, 1987.
CALZA, Francesco et al. The role of university in the smart specialization strategy: Exploring how university–industry interactions change in different technological domains. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, [s.l.], v. 69, n. 6, p. 2.6492.657, 2019.
Calza, F. et al. O papel da universidade na estratégia de especialização inteligente: explorando como as interações universidade-indústria mudam em diferentes domínios tecnológicos. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, [s.l.], v. 69, n. 6, p. 2.649-2.657, dez. 2022. DOI: 10.1109/TEM.2019.2950514.
CARAYANNIS, Elias G. et al. “Mode 3” universities and academic firms: thinking beyond the box trans-disciplinarity and nonlinear innovation dynamics within coopetitive entrepreneurial ecosystems. International Journal of Technology Management, [s.l.], v. 77, n. 1, 2, 3, p. 145, 2018.
CHADEGANI, Arezoo Aghaei et al. A Comparison between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web of Science and Scopus Databases. Asian Social Science, [s.l.], v. 9, n. 5, p. p. 18, 2013.
COBO, Manolo J. et al. A Note on the ITS Topic Evolution in the Period 2000–2009 at T-ITS. IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transportation Systems, [s.l.], v. 13, n. 1, p. 413-420, 2012.
COOMBS, Rod et al. Mudança Tecnológica e Organização. Cheltenham, UK; Northampton, Mass., USA: [s.n.], 1998.
COSH, Andy; HUGHES, Alan. Never mind the quality feel the width: University–industry links and government financial support for innovation in small high-technology businesses in the UK and the USA. The Journal of Technology Transfer, [s.l.], v. 35, n. 1, p. 66-91, 2010.
DAGHFOUS, Abdelkader; WHITE, George R. Information and innovation: a comprehensive representation. Research Policy, [s. l.], v. 23, n. 3, p. 267–280, 1994.
DAVENPORT, Thomas H.; PRUSAK, Laurence. Conhecimento empresarial: como as organizações gerenciam o seu capital intelectual. Rio de Janeiro: Campus, 1998.
DAVIS, Fred D. User acceptance of information technology: system characteristics, user perceptions and behavioral impacts. International Journal of Man-Machine Studies, [s.l.], v. 38, n. 3, p. 475-487, 1993.
DE BEM MACHADO, Andreia et al. Knowledge management and digital transformation for Industry 4.0: a structured literature review. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, [s.l.], v. 20, n. 2, p. 320-338, 2022.
DROESCHER, Fernanda Dias; SILVA, Edna Lucia da. O pesquisador e a produção científica. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, [s. l.], v. 19, p. 170–189, 2014.
FERRARIS, Alberto; SANTORO, Gabriele; PELLICELLI, Anna Claudia. “Openness” of public governments in smart cities: removing the barriers for innovation and entrepreneurship. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, [s.l.], v. 16, n. 4, p. 1.259-1.280, 2020.
GALÁN-MUROS, Victoria et al. Nurture over nature: How do European universities support their collaboration with business?. The Journal of Technology Transfer, [s.l.], v. 42, n. 1, p. 184-205, 2017.
GUPTA, Ranjit; MEJÍA, Cristian; KAJIKAWA, Yuya. Business, innovation and digital ecosystems landscape survey and knowledge cross sharing. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, [s.l.], v. 147, p. 100-109, 2019.
JACOB, Merle; LUNDQVIST, Mats; HELLSMARK, Hans. Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish University system: the case of Chalmers University of Technology. Research Policy, [s.l.], v. 32, n. 9, p. 1.555-1.568, 2003.
KERSSENS-VAN DRONGELEN, Inge C.; DE WEERD-NEDERHOF, Petra C.; FISSCHER, Olaf A. M. Describing the issues of knowledge management in R&D: towards a communication and analysis tool. R&D Management, [s.l.], v. 26, n. 3, p. 213-230, 1996.
LEONARD-BARTON, Dorothy. Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation. [S.l.]: Harvard Business School, 1995.
LICHTENTHALER, Ulrich. Open Innovation: Past Research, Current Debates, and Future Directions. Academy of Management Perspectives, [s.l.], v. 25, n. 1, p. 75-93, 2011.
MAGNIER-WATANABE, Rémy; SENOO, Dai. Organizational characteristics as prescriptive factors of knowledge management initiatives. Journal of Knowledge Management, [s.l.], v. 12, n. 1, p. 21-36, 2008.
MENG, Donghui; LI, Xianjun; RONG, Ke. Industry-to-university knowledge transfer in ecosystem-based academic entrepreneurship: Case study of automotive dynamics & control group in Tsinghua University. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, [s.l.], v. 141, p. 249-262, 2019.
METCALFE, J. S. et al. Innovation, Capabilities and Knowledge: The Epistemic Connection. [s.l.], 1996. Disponível em: https://research.manchester.ac.uk/en/publications/innovation-capabilities-and-knowledge-the-epistemic-connection. Acesso em: 29 dez. 2023.
MUNROE, Tapan. Is Silicon Valley Sustainable? Triple Helix Association. [S.l.], 2012. Disponível em: https://www.triplehelixassociation.org/helice/volume-1-2012/helice-issue-1/silicon-valley-sustainable. Acesso em: 29 dez. 2023.
MUNROE, T.; WESTWIND, M. El ecosistema de innovación de Silicon Valley. Silicon Valley: ecología de la innovación. Malaga, España: Euromedia Comunicación, 2008. p. 46-91.
NONAKA, Ikujiro; TAKEUCHI, Hirotaka. The Knowledge-Creating Company: How Japanese Companies Create the Dynamics of Innovation. [S.l.]: Oxford University Press, 1995. Disponível em: https://academic.oup.com/book/52097. Acesso em: 29 dez. 2023.
OMPI – ORGANIZAÇÃO MUNDIAL DA PROPRIEDADE INTELECTUAL. Índice Global de Inovação 2023: Resumo executivo. 16th editioned. Geneva, Switzerland: World Intellectual Property Organization, 2023. (Global Innovation Index).
PANETTI, Eva et al. Exploring the relational dimension in a smart innovation ecosystem: a comprehensive framework to define the network structure and the network portfolio. The Journal of Technology Transfer, [s.l.], v. 45, n. 6, p. 1.775-1.796, 2020.
POLANYI, Michael. The tacit dimension. London: Routledge & Kegan Paul, 1966.
RUAS, Terry Lima; PEREIRA, Luciana. Como construir indicadores de ciência, tecnologia e inovação usando Web of Science, Derwent World Patent Index, Bibexcel e Pajek?. Perspectivas em Ciência da Informação, [s.l.], v. 19, p. 52-81, 2014.
SAULAIS, Pierre. Knowledge and Ideation: Inventive Knowledge Analysis for Ideation Stimulation. [S.l.]: John Wiley & Sons, 2023.
SEPASGOZAR, Samad M. E et al. Implementing citizen centric technology in developing smart cities: A model for predicting the acceptance of urban technologies. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, [s.l.], v. 142, p. 105-116, 2019.
TAKEUCHI, Hirotaka; NONAKA, Ikujiro. Gestão do conhecimento. Porto Alegre: Bookman, 2008.
TANG, Houxing et al. Toward a more efficient knowledge network in innovation ecosystems: A simulated study on knowledge management. Sustainability, [s.l.], v. 12, n. 16, p. 6.328, 2020.
TANG, Houxing; MA, Zhenzhong; JING, Lei. Interfirm Network Structure and Innovation Creation: a Simulation Study. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, [s.l.], 2023. Disponível em: https://link.springer.com/10.1007/s13132-023-01231-x. Acesso em: 31 dez. 2023.
VELU, Chander. Knowledge management capabilities of lead firms in innovation ecosystems. AMS Review, [s.l.], v. 5, n. 3-4, p. 123-141, 2015.
WESSNER, Charles W. et al. Innovation policies for the 21st century: Report of a symposium. [S.l.]: Charles W. Wessner, 2007. Disponível em: https://nap.nationalacademies.org/catalog/11852/innovation-policies-for-the-21st-century-report-of-a-symposium. Acesso em: 29 dez. 2023.
WITTE, Patrick et al. Facilitating start-ups in port-city innovation ecosystems: A case study of Montreal and Rotterdam. Journal of Transport Geography, [s.l.], v. 71, p. 224-234, 2018.
ZUPIC, Ivan; ČATER, Tomaž. Bibliometric Methods in Management and Organization. Organizational Research Methods, [s.l.], v. 18, n. 3, p. 429-472, 2015.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Cadernos de Prospecção
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
O autor declara que: - Todos os autores foram nomeados. - Está submetendo o manuscrito com o consentimento dos outros autores. - Caso o trabalho submetido tiver sido contratado por algum empregador, tem o consentimento do referido empregador. - Os autores estão cientes de que é condição de publicação que os manuscritos submetidos a esta revista não tenham sido publicados anteriormente e não sejam submetidos ou publicados simultaneamente em outro periódico sem prévia autorização do Conselho Editorial. - Os autores concordam que o seu artigo ou parte dele possa ser distribuído e/ou reproduzido por qualquer forma, incluindo traduções, desde que sejam citados de modo completo esta revista e os autores do manuscrito. - Revista Cadernos de Prospecção está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Esta licença permite que outros remixem, adaptem e criem a partir do seu trabalho para fins não comerciais, e embora os novos trabalhos tenham de lhe atribuir o devido crédito e não possam ser usados para fins comerciais, os usuários não têm de licenciar esses trabalhos derivados sob os mesmos termos.
Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição 4.0 Internacional.
