An Industry in Pieces: the troubles of the scope and duration of design protection on spare vehicle parts of automobile manufactures in Brazil – 1996-2021

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9771/cp.v16i3.50947

Keywords:

Industrial Property, Industrial Design, Políticas Setoriais.

Abstract

Industrial design is one of the assets within the framework of intellectual property rights; the protection it confers relates to shape, be it two-dimensional or three-dimensional. One of the industries that have proactively sought to protect industrial design is automotive industry. This article proposes a brief analysis of applications and registrations of automobile manufacturers that have been sued before the Administrative Council for Economic Defense (CADE), in order to determine how assets are managed, specifically their maintenance. The chosen methodology, of a quali-quantitative exploratory nature, guides the research in the database of the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), between 1996 and 2021, comprising the maximum term of protection of industrial designs, which is 25 years. As a result, we characterize the industrial designs effectively prioritized by the automobile manufacturers and the approach underlying the maintenance of the registrations, to better understand the strategy of the management of registrations portfolio.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Patricia Pereira Peralta, Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial

Address to access this CV: http://lattes.cnpq.br/3479238992958178 Lattes ID: 3479238992958178 Post-doctorate in Cultural Studies by the Advanced Program of Contemporary Culture - UFRJ. PhD in Visual Arts from UFRJ and Master in Art History from UFRJ, the researcher has worked with areas related to intellectual property (trademarks, industrial designs and geographical indications) and intangible heritage. He began his contact with industrial property through the industrial design division of the National Institute of Industrial Property, still as a CLT. After she had already taken the public exam, she started working with the brand area at the same Institute. Since 2007, she has been acting as a permanent professor of the Professional Master's Degree at INPI, coordinating the disciplines of Protection and Management of Trademarks and Protection of Intangible Heritage. In addition, the researcher has been guiding works in the fields of trademarks, geographical indications and industrial design. As a collaborating professor of the Professional Master's Degree at the Institute of Historical and Artistic Heritage - IPHAN, she has been coordinating and teaching, together with Professor Carla Belas, the discipline of Heritage and Intellectual Property.

Matheus Mariani de Souza, Instituto Nacional da Propriedade Industrial

Master by the Postgraduate Programs in Intellectual Property and Innovation of the National Institute of Industrial Property (INPI), where I work since 2014 as Technologist in Industrial Property. I was an industrial design examiner, serving as division head for three years before becoming a trademark examiner. I currently compose the area that operates the activities related to the Madrid Protocol in Brazil at the INPI. Bachelor in Industrial Design from the Federal University of Santa Maria (UFSM).

References

BARBOSA, Denis Borges. Bases constitucionais da propriedade intelectual. 2002. Disponível em: https://www.dbba.com.br/wp-content/uploads/bases_constitucionais_pi.pdf. Acesso em: 10 maio 2021.

BARBOSA, Denis Borges. Desenhos industriais: da anterioridade do todo quanto à parte, e vice-versa. PIDCC, Aracaju, ano III, n. 6, p. 425-449, jun. 2014. Disponível em: http://www.pidcc.com.br/br/edicao-atual/2-uncategorised/140-desenhos-industriais-da-anterioridade-do-todo-quanto-a-parte-e-vice-versa. Acesso em: 10 maio 2021.

BBC NEWS BRASIL. Ford: afinal, por que a montadora decidiu encerrar a produção de veículos no Brasil? 2021. Disponível em: https://www.bbc.com/portuguese/internacional-55640907. Acesso em: 20 dez. 2022.

BRASIL. Lei n. 9.279, de 14 de maio de 1996. Regula direitos e obrigações relativos à propriedade industrial. Brasília, Distrito Federal, 1996. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.

gov.br/ccivil_03/Leis/L9279.htm. Acesso em: 10 maio 2021.

CAMELIER DA SILVA, Alberto Luís. Desenho industrial: abuso de direito no mercado de reposição. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2014.

CARVALHO, Maria Miguel. Desenhos e Modelos. Carácter singular. Cumulação com marca. In: ASCENSÃO, José de Oliveira (org.). Direito industrial. Coimbra: Almedina, 2010. v. VII. p. 421-446.

FITZPATRICK, James F. Industrial design protection and competition in automobile replacement parts – back to monopoly profits? University of Baltimore Law Review, [s.l.], v. 19, 1989. Disponível em: http://scholarworks.law.ubalt.edu/ublr/vol19/iss1/12. Acesso em 10 maio 2021.

GIL, Antônio Carlos. Métodos e técnicas de pesquisa social. São Paulo: Atlas, 2008.

GRAU-KUNTZ, Karin. O desenho industrial como instrumento de controle econômico do mercado secundário de peças de reposição de automóveis – uma análise crítica a recente decisão da Secretaria de Direito Econômico (SDE). Revista Eletrônica do IBPI, [s.l.], ed. esp., 1º jul. 2013.

LENCE REIJA, Carmen. Desarrollo del diseño: el reglamento de la ley española y la propuesta de 2004 de modificación de la Directiva. Actas de Derecho Industrial, Madrid, Marcial Pons, 2005.

MAIA, Mauricio Oscar Bandeira. Voto-vista. In: BRASIL. Ministério da Justiça. Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE). Processo administrativo n. 08012.002673/2007-51. [Brasília], DF: CADE, 14 mar. 2018.

MINISTÉRIO DA JUSTIÇA. Processo administrativo n. 08012.002673/2007-51. [S.l.]: CADE, 2007.

MORO, Maitê Cecília Fabbri. Marcas tridimensionais. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2009.

MOURA E SILVA, Miguel. Desenhos e modelos industriais – um paradigma perdido? In: ASCENSÃO, José de Oliveira. Direito Industrial. Coimbra: Almedina, 2001. v. I. p. 431-451.

OLAVO, Carlos. “Desenhos e modelos: evolução legislativa”. In: ASCENSÃO, José de Oliveira. Direito Industrial. Coimbra: Almedina, 2003. v. III. p. 45-76.

RODRIGUES JR., Edson Beas. Abuso no exercício dos direitos de propriedade intelectual e repressão às infrações contra a ordem econômica: as contribuições do caso ANFAPE e do Acordo TRIPS. [S.l.: s.n.], 2016.

SILVA, Pedro Souza e. A proteção jurídica do design. Coimbra: Almedina, 2017.

SILVEIRA, Newton. O abuso das montadoras face às fabricantes independentes de autopeças. Parecer ANFAPE – peças de automóveis, [s.l.], 2010.

SILVEIRA, Paula Farani de Azevedo. Voto-vogal. In: BRASIL. Ministério da Justiça. Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE). Processo administrativo n. 08012.002673/2007-51. [Brasília], DF: CADE, 16 mar. 2018.

SILVEIRA, Paulo Burnier. Voto. In: BRASIL. Ministério da Justiça. Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE). Processo administrativo n. 08012.002673/2007-51. [Brasília], DF: CADE, 16 mar. 2018.

VILANOVA, Polyanna Ferreira Silva. Voto-vogal. In: BRASIL. Ministério da Justiça. Conselho Administrativo de Defesa Econômica (CADE). Processo administrativo n. 08012.002673/2007-51. [Brasília], DF: CADE, 14 fev. 2008.

Published

2023-04-01

How to Cite

Peralta, P. P., & Souza, M. M. de. (2023). An Industry in Pieces: the troubles of the scope and duration of design protection on spare vehicle parts of automobile manufactures in Brazil – 1996-2021. Cadernos De Prospecção, 16(3), 620–637. https://doi.org/10.9771/cp.v16i3.50947

Issue

Section

Propriedade Intelectual, Inovação e Desenvolvimento