Prospective Study of Scientific and Technological Bases Used in Search for Anteriority in the Areas of Life Sciences

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9771/cp.v14i3.33106

Keywords:

Pre-Prospecting, Patents, Scientific Publications.

Abstract

Among the activities performed by the Technological Innovation Centers, the search for scientific and patent information is considered essential and provides important elements to support the decision making process in Science and Technology Institutes. Few works found in the literature present guidelines as to which scientific and technological bases are the most indicated for conducting studies in the areas and subareas inherent to the medical and biological sciences. Therefore, the present work aims to map the main scientific and technological bases that can be used in studies in the areas of life sciences. Such tools were identified by reading the title, abstract and methodology fields of papers published by the journals Cadernos de Prospecção, Geintec and by CEE. The results indicated that Espacenet, INPI, Patentscope, USPTO and WoS were the most used bases in the studies, suggesting their use in the retrieval of documents from the areas specified above.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

ANALYTICS, CLARIVATE. Research in Brazil: a report for CAPES by Clarivate Analytics. v. 1, 2018. Disponível em: https://www-periodicos-capes-govbr.ezl.periodicos.capes.gov.br/index.php?option=com_pnews&component=NewsShow&view=pnewsnewsshow&cid=774&mn=71&. Acesso em: 14 abr. 2021.

ANTUNES, A. M. S. et al. Métodos de Prospecção Tecnológica, Inteligência Competitiva e Foresight: principais conceitos e técnicas. In: RIBEIRO, N. M. Prospecção Tecnológica. Salvador: IFBA/FORTEC, 2018. (Coleção PROFNIT). v. 1. p. 48-60. Disponível em: http://www.profnit.org.br/wp content/uploads/2018/08/PROFNIT-Serie-Prospeccao-Tecnologica-Volume-1-1.pdf. Acesso em: 13 out. 2018.

ARAÚJO, Elza Fernandes et al. Propriedade Intelectual: proteção e gestão estratégica do conhecimento. Revista Brasileira de Zootecnia, [s.l.], v. 39, p. 1-10, 2010.

AHARONSON, B. S.; SCHILLING, M. A. Mapping the technological landscape: Measuring technology distance, technological footprints, and technology evolution. Research Policy, [s.l.], v. 45, n. 1, p. 81-96, 2016.

BAJWA, R. S.; YALDRAM, K. Bibliometric analysis of biotechnology research in Pakistan. Scientometrics, [s.l.], v. 95, n. 2, p. 529-540, 2013.

BELL, M. et al. The development of technological capabilities. Trade, Technology and International Competitiveness, [s.l.], v. 22, n. 4831, p. 69-101, 1995.

BORÉM, A. et al. Entendendo a biotecnologia. Viçosa: Editora da UFV, 2008.

BRASIL. Lei n. 10.973, de 2 de dezembro de 2004. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2004-2006/2004/lei/l10.973.htm. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2021.

BRASIL. Lei n. 13.243, de 11 de janeiro de 2016. Disponível em: http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/_ato2015-2018/2016/lei/l13243.htm. Acesso em: 13 abr. 2021.

CABRAL, B. P.; FONSECA, M. D.; MOTA, F. B. The recent landscape of cancer research worldwide: a bibliometric and network analysis. Oncotarget, [s.l.], v. 9, n. 55, p. 30474, 2018.

DEBACKERE, K et al. Measuring progress and evolution in science and technology–II: The multiple uses of technometric indicators. International Journal of Management Reviews, [s.l.], v. 4, n. 3, p. 213-231, 2002.

DRUCKER, P. F. A inovação deliberada e as sete fontes de oportunidade inovadora. Inovação e espírito sempre. São Paulo: Biblioteca Pioneira de Administração e Negócios, 1986.

FARR, J. L.; WEST, M. A. (ed.). Innovation and creativity at work: Psychological and organizational strategies. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 1990.

HUNT, D.; NGUYEN, L.; RODGERS, M. (ed.). Patent searching: Tools & techniques. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, 2012.

LINHARES, F. R. et al. A importância de se fazer busca de anterioridade. Cadernos de Prospecção, Salvador, v. 10, n. 4, p. 696-705, 2017.

MOTA, B. F. et al. Mapping the – dynamic capabilities scientific landscape, 1990-2015: a bibliometric analysis. Collnet Journal of Scientometrics and Information Management, [s.l.], v. 11, p. 1-16, 2017.

MOTA, B. F.; MONTEIRO, R. Colaboração CDTS-VPPLR em estudos de informação científica e tecnológica e de foresight: Documento de Trabalho, Fundação Oswaldo Cruz. Rio de Janeiro: Fiocruz, 2015.

MOTA, F. B et al. Mapping the dengue scientific landscape worldwide: a bibliometric and network analysis. Memórias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz, [s.l.], v. 112, n. 5, p. 354-363, 2017.

OLDHAM, Paul; HALL, Stephen; BURTON, Geoff. Synthetic biology: mapping the scientific landscape. PLoS One, [s.l.], v. 7, n. 4, 2012.

QUINTELLA, C. M.; TORRES, E. A. Gestão e Comercialização de Tecnologia. Capacitação de Inovação Tecnológica para Empresários. 1. ed. Aracaju, SE: Editora da UFS, 2011. v. 1, p. 225-242.

QUINTELLA, C. M. et al. Busca de Anterioridade: Prospecção tecnológica. 1. ed. Salvador: Editora da IFBA, 2018. Cap. 115-116.

SCHUMPETER, J. A. Capitalism, socialism and democracy (1942). J. Econ. Literature, [s.l.], v. 20, p. 1.463, 1976.

SINGH, V.; CHAKRABORTY, K.; VINCENT, L. Patent database: Their importance in prior art documentation and patent search. 2016.

TAN, Kheng Hua et al. Coffee capsule. U.S. Patent Application n. 29/475,236, 4 nov. 2014.

VINCENT, C. L et al. Patent data mining in fisheries sector: An analysis using Questel-Orbit and Espacenet. World Patent Information, [s.l.], v. 51, p. 22-30, 2017.

WAAIJER, Cathelijn J. F.; PALMBLAD, Magnus. Bibliometric mapping: Eight decades of analytical chemistry, with special focus on the use of mass spectrometry. Publicações ACS, [s.l.], v. 87, n. 9, p. 4.588-4.596, 2015.

Published

2021-07-01

How to Cite

Santos, J. R., & Rocha, A. M. (2021). Prospective Study of Scientific and Technological Bases Used in Search for Anteriority in the Areas of Life Sciences. Cadernos De Prospecção, 14(3), 784. https://doi.org/10.9771/cp.v14i3.33106

Issue

Section

Prospecções Tecnológicas de Assuntos Específicos