BELO HORIZONTE FOR WHOM? BLACK VERSIONS TERRITORIAL FOR A WHITE SPACE PLANNED CAREFULLY

Authors

  • Ana Maria Martins Queiroz Universidade Federal de Goiás

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9771/1984-5537geo.v11i1.12039

Keywords:

City, Planning, Territory quilombola, Belo Horizonte

Abstract

In this article I discuss other possibilities for thinking the city in order to problematize the discourses and practices that deny these contradictions and conflicts in such space, such as those related to race/ethnicity. I point out that many of the practices and mechanisms involved in the production of urban space permeate is markedly prospects hygienist and eugenicist. With this and look through a discourse of a supposed racial democracy in this city are established strategies that reinforce the exclusion of blacks the socio-spatial dynamics of urban. There is therefore considers the territories in which this ethnic-racial group makes other urban cartography in an attempt to seek revaluation of their cultural and identity. However, the black communities are forging counter-discourses that might reframe their places and roles in society. The discussions presented here focuses Belo Horizonte/Minas Gerais and settle from the community quilombola Manzo Ngunzo Kaiango located in that city.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biography

Ana Maria Martins Queiroz, Universidade Federal de Goiás

Doutoranda em geografia, Instituto de Estudos Socioambientais - IESA/UFG

Published

2015-07-10

How to Cite

Queiroz, A. M. M. (2015). BELO HORIZONTE FOR WHOM? BLACK VERSIONS TERRITORIAL FOR A WHITE SPACE PLANNED CAREFULLY. GeoTextos, 11(1). https://doi.org/10.9771/1984-5537geo.v11i1.12039

Issue

Section

Artigos