Adaptação Improvisada em Equipa: Um Modelo de Adaptação em Tempo Real
Palavras-chave:
Improvisação, Adaptação, Tempo, Aprendizagem, EquipasResumo
Quando as equipas precisam de se adaptar num contexto de escassez extrema de tempo, elas podem paralisar, podem manter o plano anterior, ou podem improvisar um novo plano. Este último fenómeno consiste na adaptação improvisada em equipa. Sendo um conceito recente, pouco se sabe sobre como as equipas se podem adaptar eficazmente em situações de carência temporal, e como podem produzir conhecimento a partir destes processos. Neste artigo conceptual, desenvolvemos um modelo teórico, baseado num fluxo temporal, o qual contribui para um melhor entendimento da adaptação improvisada. Propomos um conjunto de fatores de influência temporais, moderadores da resposta a estímulos contingenciais, e um conjunto de processos de equipa, fundamentais para a eficácia da adaptação improvisada. Propomos, ainda, que a reflexividade em equipa medeia a relação da adaptação improvisada com a aprendizagem. Ao explorar o fluxo temporal da adaptação improvisada em equipa, estendemos as literaturas de improvisação e de adaptação, aumentando a granularidade dos construtos, alargando a sua rede nomológica.
Downloads
Referências
ABRANTES, C. M. A., PASSOS, A. M., CUNHA, M. P., e SANTOS, C. M. Bringing team improvisation to team adaptation: The combined role of shared temporal cognitions and team learning behaviors fostering team performance. Journal of Business Research, v. 84, p. 59 –71, 2018.
AKGÜN, A. E., BYRNE, J. C., LYNN, G. S., e KESKIN, H. New product development in turbulent environments: Impact of improvisation and unlearning on new product performance. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, v. 24, n. 3, p. 203–230, 2007.
AKGÜN, A. E. e LYNN, G. S. New product development team improvisation and speed-to-market: an extended model. European Journal of Innovation Management, v. 5, p. 117–129, 2002.
Ancona, D. G., Okhuysen, G. A., & Perlow, L. A. Taking time to integrate temporal research. Academy of Management Review, v. 26, n. 4, p. 512–529. 2001.
BAARD, S. K., RENCH, T. A, e KOZLOWSKI, S. W. J. Performance adaptation: A theoretical integration and review. Journal of Management, v. 40, n. 1, p. 48–99. 2014.
BAKER, T., MINER, A. S., e EESLEY, D. T. Improvising firms: Bricolage, account giving and improvisational competencies in the founding process. Research Policy, v. 32, p. 255–276. 2003.
BARRETT, F. J. Creativity and improvisation in jazz and organizations: Implications for organizational learning. Organization Science, v. 9, n. 5, p. 605–622, 1998.
BARTEL, C. A., e MILLIKEN, F. J. Perceptions of time in work groups: Do members develop shared cognitions about their temporal demands? In: BLOUNT, S. (Org.), Research on managing groups and teams: Time in groups 6. New York: Elsevier, 2004. p. 87–109.
BASTIEN, D. T., e HOSTAGER, T. J. Jazz as a process of organizational innovation. Communication Research, v. 15, 582–602. 1988.
BURKE, C. S., STAGL, K. C., SALAS, E., PIERCE, L., e KENDALL, D. Understanding team adaptation: A conceptual analysis and model. Journal of Applied Psychology, v. 91, n. 6, p. 1189–1207. 2006.
CANNON-BOWERS, J. A., SALAS, E., & CONVERSE, S. A. Shared mental models in expert team decision making. In; CASTELLAN, JR. N. J. (Org.), Individual and group decision making: Current issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1993. p. 221–246.
CHELARIU, C., JOHNSTON, W. J., e YOUNG, L. Learning to improvise, improvising to learn: a process of responding to complex environments. Journal of Business Research, v. 55, p. 141–147. 2002.
CONTE, J., LANDY, F, & MATHIEU J. Time urgency: Conceptual and construct development. Journal of Applied Psychology, v. 80, n. 1, p. 178–185. 1995.
CROSSAN, M., CUNHA, M. P., VERA, D., e CUNHA, J. V. Time and organizational improvisation. Academy of Management Review, v. 30, n. 1, p. 129–145. 2005.
CROSSAN, M. M., LANE, H. W., WHITE, R. E., e KLUS, L. The improvising organization: Where planning meets opportunity. Organizational Dynamics, v. 24, p. 20–35. 1996.
CROSSAN, M., e SORRENTI, M. Making sense of improvisation. Advances in Strategic Management, v. 14, p. 155–180. 1997.
CUNHA, M.P. All that jazz: Três aplicações do conceito de improvisação organizacional. Revista de Administração de Empresas, v. 42, n. 3, p. 36–42. 2002.
CUNHA, M. P., CLEGG, S., REGO, A., e NEVES, P. Organizational improvisation: From the constraint of strict tempo to the power of the avant-garde. Creativity and Innovation Management, v. 23, n. 4, p. 359–373. 2014.
CUNHA, M. P., CUNHA, J. V., e KAMOCHE, K. Organizational improvisation: What, when, how and why. International Journal of Management Reviews, v. 1, n. 3, p. 299–341. 1999.
CUNHA, M. P., KAMOCHE, K., e CUNHA, R. C. Organizational improvisation and leadership: A field study in two computer-mediated settings. International Studies of Management & Organization, v. 33, n. 1, p. 34–57. 2003.
CUNHA, M. P., NEVES, P., CLEGG, S. R., e REGO, A. Tales of the unexpected: Discussing improvisational learning. Management Learning, v. 46, p. 511–529. 2015.
CUNHA, M.P., REGO, A. e REGO, T.M. Superquipas. 4 ed. Lisboa: Actual, 2018.
DERUE, D. S., HOLLENBECK, J. R., JOHNSON, M. D., ILGEN, D. R., e JUNDT, D. K. How different team downsizing approaches influence team-level adaptation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, v. 51, n. 1, p. 182–196. 2008.
DE TIENNE, D., e MALLETTE, P. Antecedents and outcomes of innovation-oriented cultures. International Journal of Business and Management, v. 7, n. 18, 1–11. 2012.
EDMONDSON, A. C. Psychological safety and learning behavior in work teams. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 44, p. 350–383. 1999.
EDMONDSON, A. C., DILLON, J. R., e ROLOFF, K. S. Three perspectives on team learning. The Academy of Management Annals, v. 1, n. 1, p. 269–314. 2007.
ENTIN, E. E., e SERFATY, D. Adaptive team coordination. Human Factors, v. 41, n. 2, p. 312–325. 1999.
FREEDMAN, J. L., & EDWARDS, D. R. Time pressure, task performance, and enjoyment. In: MCGRATH J. E. (Org.), The social psychology of time. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 1988, p. 113–133.
GIBSON, C. B., & BIRKINSHAW, J. The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal, v. 47, n. 2, p. 209–226. 2004.
HADIDA, A. L., TARVAINEN, W., & ROSE, J. Organizational improvisation: A consolidating review and framework. International Journal of Management Reviews, v. 17, p. 437–459. 2015.
HATCH, M. J. Exploring the empty spaces of organizing: How improvisational jazz helps redescribe organizational structure. Organization Studies, v. 20, p. 75–100. 1999.
HOEGL, M., e PARBOTEEAH, K. P. Team reflexivity in innovative projects. R&D Management, v. 36, n. 2, p. 113–125. 2006.
KAMOCHE, K., & CUNHA, M. P. Minimal structures: From jazz improvisation to product innovation. Organization Studies, v. 22, n. 5, p. 733–764. 2001.
KOZLOWSKI, S. W. J., WATOLA, D. J., NOWAKOWSKI, J. M., KIM, B. H., e BOTERO, I. C. Developing adaptive teams: A theory of dynamic team leadership. In: Salas, E., Goodwin, G. F. e Burke C. S. (Org.), Team effectiveness in complex organizations: Cross-disciplinary perspectives and approaches (SIOP Frontier Series). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 2009, p. 113–155.
LEPINE, J. A. Team adaptation and postchange performance: Effects of team composition in terms of members’ cognitive ability and personality. Journal of Applied Psychology, v. 88, n. 1, p. 27–39. 2003.
LEPINE, J. A. Adaptation of teams in response to unforeseen change: Effects of goal difficulty and team composition in terms of cognitive ability and goal orientation. Journal of Applied Psychology, v. 90, n. 6, p. 1153–1167. 2005.
LOUIS, M. R. e SUTTON, R. I. Switching cognitive gears: From habits of mind to active thinking. Human Relations, v. 44, p. 55–76. 1991.
MAGNI, M., PROVERA, B., e PROSERPIO, L. Individual attitude toward improvisation in information systems development. Behaviour & Information Technology, v. 29, n. 3, p. 245–255. 2010.
MARKS, M. A., MATHIEU, J. E., e ZACCARO, S. A temporarily based framework and taxonomy of team process. Academy of Management Review, v. 26, n. 3, p. 356–376. 2001.
MARQUES-QUINTEIRO, P., CURRAL, L., PASSOS, A. M., & LEWIS, K. And now what do we do? The role of transactive memory systems and task coordination in action teams. Group Dynamics: Theory, Research, and Practice, v. 17, n. 3. P. 194–206. 2013.
MAYNARD, M. T., KENNEDY, D. M., e SOMMER, S. A. Team adaptation: A fifteen-year synthesis (1998 – 2013) and framework for how this literature needs to “adapt” going forward. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, v. 24, n. 5, p. 652–677. 2015.
MILLER, D. A preliminary typology of organizational learning: Synthesizing the literature. Journal of Management, v. 22, n. 3, p. 485–505. 1996.
MINER, A. S., BASSOFF, P., e MOORMAN, C. Organizational improvisation and learning: A field study. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 46, p. 304–337. 2001.
MOORMAN, C., e MINER, A. S. Organizational improvisation and organizational memory. Academy of Management Review, v. 23, n. 4, p. 698–723. 1998a.
MOORMAN, C., e MINER, A. S. The convergence of planning and execution: Improvisation in new product development. Journal of Marketing, v. 62, n. 3, p. 1–20. 1998b.
NICKERSON, J. A., e ZENGER, T. R. A knowledge-based theory of the firm - The problem-solving perspective. Organization Science, v. 15, n. 6, p. 617–632. 2004.
ORR, J. E. Talking about Machines: An Ethnography of a Modern Job. Ithaca, NY: ILR Press, 1996.
PAVLOU, P. A., e SAWY, O. A. The “third hand”: IT-enabled competitive advantage in turbulence through improvisational capabilities. Information Systems Research, v. 21, n. 3, p. 443–471. 2010.
PULAKOS, E. D., ARAD, S., DONOVAN, M. A., e PLAMONDON, K. E. Adaptability in the workplace: development of a taxonomy of adaptive performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, v. 85, n. 4, p. 612–624. 2000.
PULAKOS, E. D., SCHMITT, N., DORSEY, D. W., ARAD, S., BORMAN, W. C., e HEDGE, J. W. Predicting adaptive performance: Further tests of a model of adaptability. Human Performance, v. 15, n. 4, p. 299–323. 2002.
RANDALL, K. R., RESICK, C. J., e DECHURCH, L. A. Building team adaptive capacity: the roles of sensegiving and team composition. Journal of Applied Psychology, v. 96, n. 3, p. 525–540. 2011.
SANTOS, C. M., UITDEWILLIGEN, S., e PASSOS, A. M. A temporal common ground for learning: The moderating effect of shared mental models on the relation between team learning behaviours and performance improvement. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, v. 24, n. 5, p. 710–725. 2015.
SCHIPPERS, M. C., DEN HARTOG, D. N., KOOPMAN, P. L., e WIENK, J. A. Diversity and team outcomes: The moderating effects of outcome interdependence and group longevity and the mediating effect of reflexivity. Journal of Organizational Behavior, v. 24, n. 6, p. 779–802. 2003.
SCHIPPERS, M. C., HOMAN, A. C., e VAN KNIPPENBERG, D. To reflect or not to reflect: Prior team performance as a boundary condition of the effects of reflexivity on learning and final team performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, v. 34, p. 6–23. 2013.
SCHIPPERS, M. C., WEST, M. A., e DAWSON, J. F. Team reflexivity and innovation: The moderating role of team context. Journal of Management, v. 41, n. 3, p. 769–788. 2015.
SCHMUTZ, J. B., e EPPICH, W. J. Promoting learning and patient care through shared reflection: a conceptual framework for team reflexivity in health care. Academic Medicine, v. 92, n. 11, p. 1555–1563. 2017.
SCOTT, S. G., e BRUCE, R. A. Decision-making style: The development and assessment of a new measure. Educational and Psychological Measurement, v. 55, n. 5, p. 818–831. 1995.
SHIN, S. J., KIM, T., LEE, J., e BIAN, L. Cognitive team diversity and individual team member creativity: a cross-level interaction. Academy of Management Journal, v. 55, n. 1, p. 197–212. 2012.
STANDIFER, R., e BLUEDORN, A. Alliance management teams and entrainment: Sharing temporal mental models. Human Relations, v. 59, n. 7, p. 903–927. 2006.
TANNENBAUM, S. I., e CERASOLI, C. P. Do team and individual debriefs enhance performance? A meta-analysis. Human Factors, v. 55, n. 1, p. 231–245. 2013.
VALAEI, N., REZAEI, S., e ISMAIL, W. K. W. Examining learning strategies, creativity, and innovation at SMEs using fuzzy set Qualitative Comparative Analysis and PLS path modeling. Journal of Business Research, v. 70, p. 224–233. 2017.
VERA, D., e CROSSAN, M. Theatrical improvisation: Lessons for organizations. Organization Studies, v. 25, n. 5, p. 727–749. 2004.
VERA, D., & CROSSAN, M. Improvisation and innovative performance in teams. Organization Science, v. 16, n. 3, p. 203–224. 2005.
WALLER, M. J., CONTE, J. M., GIBSON, C. B., e CARPENTER, M. A. The effect of individual perceptions of deadlines on team performance. Academy of Management Review, v. 26, n. 4, p. 586–600. 2001.
WANG, X. H. F., KIM, T. Y., e LEE, D. R. Cognitive diversity and team creativity: Effects of team intrinsic motivation and transformational leadership. Journal of Business Research, v. 69, n. 9, p 3231–3239. 2016.
WEICK, K. E. The collapse of sensemaking in organizations: The Mann Gulch disaster. Administrative Science Quarterly, v. 38, p. 628–652. 1993.
WELDON, E. The development of product and process improvements in work groups. Group & Organization Management, v. 25, p. 244–268. 2000.
ZIMBARDO, P. G., e BOYD, J. N. Putting time in perspective: A valid, reliable, individual-differences metric. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, v. 77, n. 6, p. 1271–1288. 1999.
