ICR: A Composite and Automatable Index for Bank Risk Diagnosis Based on Capital, Solvency, and Leverage

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9771/rcufba.v19i2.69685

Keywords:

Banking Risk, Regulatory Capital, Prudential Indicators, Regtech, Financial Risk

Abstract

The assessment of banking risk remains fragmented, technical, and often inaccessible to most market participants, limiting comparability across institutions and reducing the quality of investment and exposure decisions. This article introduces the Composite Risk Index (ICR) as an innovative technological solution designed to diagnose banking risk in an automated, visual, and replicable manner using public and regulatory data. The model integrates three prudential pillars, Basel Index, Solvency, and Leverage, through a transparent formula that automatically penalizes institutions operating below minimum regulatory thresholds. Implemented as a functional MVP, the ICR includes automated spreadsheets that enable adoption by risk analysts, compliance managers, investment funds, public agencies, and companies with multiple banking relationships. Applied to 150 Brazilian financial institutions using real data from 2020 to 2024, the model was also tested on banks that experienced moments of stress, demonstrating its predictive capability. The results show that the ICR contributes to a standardized, agile, and accessible reading of banking risk, with the potential to strengthen strategic decision-making in a financial system characterized by information asymmetry and regulatory complexity.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Altman, E. I. (1968). Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. The Journal of Finance, 23(4), 589–609. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1968.tb00843

Arner, D. W., Barberis, J., & Buckley, R. P. (2017). FinTech and RegTech: Enabling innovation while preserving financial stability. Georgetown Journal of International Affairs, 18(3), 47–58. https://doi.org/10.1353/gia.2017.0033

Assaf Neto, A. (2022). Mercado financeiro (14ª ed.). São Paulo: Atlas.

Banco Central do Brasil. (2024). Relatório de estabilidade financeira. Brasília: Banco Central do Brasil. https://www.bcb.gov.br

Barth, J. R. (2018). Benefits and costs of a higher bank “leverage ratio”. Journal of Financial Stability, 39, 209–225. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2018.09.005

Basel Committee on Banking Supervision. (2025). Basel III monitoring report. Basel: Bank for International Settlements. https://www.bis.org

Betz, F., Oprică, S., Peltonen, T. A., & Sarlin, P. (2014). Predicting distress in European banks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 45, 225–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.11.041

Bi, Y., & Bao, Y. (2024). Machine learning for systemic banking risk detection: Evidence from multi-country data. Finance Research Letters, 60, 104384. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104384

Choi, D. B. (2018). Bank leverage limits and regulatory arbitrage. Federal Reserve Bank of New York Staff Reports, 856. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3286082

DeAngelo, H. (2013). Why high leverage is optimal for banks. Journal of Financial Economics, 109(1), 21–40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.02.002

Dhingra, J., Singh, K., & Chakrabarty, S. P. (2022). Leverage ratio: An empirical study of the

European banking system. Journal of Banking Regulation, 23(4), 325–345 https://doi.org/10.1057/s41261-021-00168-3

European Banking Authority, & European Central Bank. (2024). SREP 2024: Supervisory review and evaluation process. Frankfurt: EBA & ECB.

European Central Bank. (2025). Financial stability review. Frankfurt: European Central Bank.

Fender, I., Lewrick, U., & Schmieder, C. (2015). Calibrating the leverage ratio. BIS Quarterly Review, December 2015, 43–58. https://www.bis.org/publ/qtrpdf/r_qt1512f.htm

Financial Stability Board. (2024). Global monitoring report on non-bank financial intermediation. Basel: FSB.

Laeven, L., & Valencia, F. (2018). Systemic banking crises revisited. IMF Working Paper WP/18/206. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781484376379.001

Nguyen, T., Vo, T., & Ngo, Q. (2024). Structured factor copulas for systemic risk measurement in global banking. Journal of Banking & Finance, 157, 106741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2023.106741

Philippon, T. (2016). The FinTech opportunity. NBER Working Paper Series, 22476. https://doi.org/10.3386/w22476

Poledna, S., Thurner, S., Farmer, J. D., & Geanakoplos, J. (2013). Leverage-induced systemic risk under Basel II and other credit risk policies. Journal of Banking & Finance, 37(11), 3879–3895. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2013.07.018

Sun, H., Li, J., & Wang, Y. (2024). Bank stability prediction using Transformer-based models. Expert Systems with Applications, 237, 121524. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2023.121524

Xu, Z., Chen, L., & Zhao, H. (2024). GRU neural networks for short-term liquidity risk forecasting in banks. The Journal of Financial Data Science, 6(2), 45–63. https://doi.org/10.3905/jfds.2024.1.125

Published

2025-12-11

How to Cite

kos junior, C. (2025). ICR: A Composite and Automatable Index for Bank Risk Diagnosis Based on Capital, Solvency, and Leverage. Revista De Contabilidade Da UFBA, 19(2), e2513. https://doi.org/10.9771/rcufba.v19i2.69685