Radiographic evaluation of periimplantar alveolar bone during healing period - studies of cases through digital images

Authors

  • Mady Crusoé de Souza
  • Maíra Dias Sampaio
  • Marianna Guanaes Gomes Torres
  • Paula Paes
  • Ieda Crusoé–Rebello
  • Paulo Sérgio Flores Campos

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.9771/cmbio.v6i2.4190

Keywords:

Osseointegration - Dental implants - Digital images.

Abstract

The radiographic evaluation of marginal bone loss around dental implants represents a relevant diagnostic method for osseointegration, despite its limitations. Digital radiographs can provide the same qualitative diagnostic information as conventional radiographs, additionally being able to register quantitative changes in bone density. The aim of this study was to assess gray scale values of areas adjacent to implants during healing period. Pre-implant and post-implant (30, 60, and 120 days after surgery) periapical radiographs were digitized in the DentScan DentView® system. Periapical radiographic images of seven individuals with single surface-treated implants were employed. Results showed a substantial increase of gray values for all the areas assessed in post-implant radiographs 30 days after insertion. Most areas presented a decrease of gray values in radiographs 60 days after implant insertion, and those values tended to increase again 120 days after surgery. It is concluded that gray level measurement represents an acceptable tool to be employed in the radiographic follow up of implant osseointegration during healing period. Further studies with larger samples and a longer follow-up period must be carried out in order to determine osseointegration patterns in dental implantology.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Published

2007-02-03

How to Cite

Souza, M. C. de, Sampaio, M. D., Torres, M. G. G., Paes, P., Crusoé–Rebello, I., & Campos, P. S. F. (2007). Radiographic evaluation of periimplantar alveolar bone during healing period - studies of cases through digital images. Journal of Medical and Biological Sciences, 6(2), 145–181. https://doi.org/10.9771/cmbio.v6i2.4190

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 3 > >>