Determination of upper limits of the thermal comfort zone for quails acclimatized in Brazil 22-35 days old

Authors

  • Marilú Santos Sousa Universidade Federal do Tocantins
  • Ilda de Fátima Ferreira Tinôco UFV
  • Sérgio Luiz de Toledo Barreto UFV
  • Adriana Garcia do Amaral UFMT
  • Luanna Chácara Pires UFPI
  • Aloízio Soares Ferreira UFV

Abstract

The objective of this research was to determine the temperature comfort, evaluated in terms of temperature and indices Black Globe Temperature and Humidity (BGTH), appropriate to the creation of quails in the final phase. Were housed 300 quails in different thermal environments. Each group of 60 birds were distributed randomly into 03 chambers, with 10 birds per pen (cage), totaling 15 treatments. The treatments were: CP - Comfort Pressed (temperatures of 26 and 25 oC, respectively, for fourth and fifth week of creation); MH - Moderate heat (30 °C for the fourth and fifth week of creation) and HS - Heat Severus (33 oC for the fourth and fifth week of creation). During the fourth week of creation quail (22-28 days), the best value of BGTH was 75.8 ± 0.9 and for the fifth week of creation (29-35 days) BGTH 75.3 ± 0, 7 (indicative of thermal comfort for this age). It was found that: quail maintained in thermal stress (either hot or cold) during the initial phase can not recover the end of the life cycle, even when reared under conditions of thermal comfort in the initial stage after this period, while kept at temperatures of heat stress is moderate or severe chronic, can not keep up with the normal performance, demonstrating the need to ensure that the thermal environment of poultry is kept in accordance with the appropriate requirements for each age of the quail.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Marilú Santos Sousa, Universidade Federal do Tocantins

Escola de Medicina Veterinária e Zootecnia - EMVZ. Campus de Araguaína.

Ilda de Fátima Ferreira Tinôco, UFV

Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola, Av. PH Rolfs s/n, Campus Universitário, CEP: 36570-000, Viçosa, MG.

Sérgio Luiz de Toledo Barreto, UFV

Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Departamento de Zootecnia, Av. PH Rolfs s/n, Campus Universitário, CEP: 36570-000, Viçosa, MG.

Adriana Garcia do Amaral, UFMT

Universidade Federal do Mato Grosso, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Departamento de Engenharia Agrícola, Av. Fernando Corrêa da Costa, n. 2367, Bairro Boa Esperança, CEP: 78060-900, Cuiabá, MT

Luanna Chácara Pires, UFPI

Universidade Federal do Piauí, Campus “Professora Cinobelina Elvas”, BR 135, km 3 - Bairro Planalto Horizonte, CEP: 64900-000, Bom Jesus, PI.

Aloízio Soares Ferreira, UFV

Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Centro de Ciências Agrárias, Departamento de Zootecnia, Av. PH Rolfs s/n, Campus Universitário, CEP: 36570-000, Viçosa, MG.

Published

2014-06-26

Issue

Section

Animal Production and Environment