COMPARAISON DU TEMPS DE LIGHT-DURCISSEMENT AVEC L'UTILISATION DE DIFFÉRENTES INTENSITÉS LED DANS LE COLLAGE DES BRACKETS ORTHODONTIQUES

Auteurs

DOI :

https://doi.org/10.9771/cmbio.v23i1.53194

Mots-clés :

light curing, shear strenght, remnant adhesive index

Résumé

Objective: To compare the shear bond strength of metallic brackets after orthodontic bonding using conventional and high-intensity light curing devices.

Methods: Eighty bovine central incisors were randomly divided into four groups according to curing time and LED devices: G1- Use of conventional LED LCU curing for 20 seconds (Emitter D - Wireless, Schuster, Brazil); G2-  High Intensity LED LCU for 3 seconds (Valo Cordless, Ultradent Products, USA); G3- High Intensity LED LCU for 3 seconds (Flash Max P4 Ortho Pro, CMS Dental A / S, Denmark) and G4 - High Intensity LED LCU for 3 seconds (LEDX-T 2400 Orthometric, Brazil). Twenty-four hours after bonding, brackets were subjected to a universal testing machine with a shear bond strength (SBS) test. The Enamel surface was visually evaluated with the Adhesive Remnant Index (ARI). The one-way ANOVA was performed to compare the SBS between the different light-curing devices. The adhesive remnant index (ARI) was compared with the chi-square test.

Results: There were no significant differences between the groups (p = 0.767). The analysis of the adhesive remnant index also showed no statistically significant differences between the groups.

Conclusion: There was no difference in the shear bond strength and ARI index with a curing time of 3 seconds in high-intensity LCU and 20 seconds in conventional LCU.

Téléchargements

Les données relatives au téléchargement ne sont pas encore disponibles.

Téléchargements

Publiée

2024-06-04

Comment citer

Ceribelli, B. M., Cotrin, P., Hermont Cançado, R. ., Pinelli Valarelli, F., & Salvatore de Freitas, K. M. (2024). COMPARAISON DU TEMPS DE LIGHT-DURCISSEMENT AVEC L’UTILISATION DE DIFFÉRENTES INTENSITÉS LED DANS LE COLLAGE DES BRACKETS ORTHODONTIQUES. Revista De Ciências Médicas E Biológicas, 23(1), 62–66. https://doi.org/10.9771/cmbio.v23i1.53194

Articles les plus lus par le même auteur ou la même autrice