Economic evaluation of the tomato and guava residues inclusion in laying hens ration

Authors

  • Edney Pereira Silva Universidade Federeal Rural de Pernambuco
  • Carlos Bôa-Viagem Rabello Universidade Federeal Rural de Pernambuco
  • Wilson Moreira Dutra Júnior Universidade Federeal Rural de Pernambuco
  • Riviana Roberta de Souza Loureiro Universidade Federeal Rural de Pernambuco
  • Andréa Aparecida de Souza Guimarães Universidade Federeal Rural de Pernambuco
  • Michele Bernardino de Lima Universidade Federeal Rural de Pernambuco
  • Emmanuele Maria Florêncio de Arruda Universidade Federeal Rural de Pernambuco
  • Rodrigo Barbosa-Lima UFPB

Abstract

The objective of this research was to economically analyze the effect of different levels of inclusion of tomatoes and guava residues on ration for laying hens. To it, 360 DekalbWhite hens with 30 weeks of age have been used. The birds have been distributed in a totally randomized design with nine treatments and five repetitions of eight birds per parcel. The treatments had: a reference ration and another eight rations with increasing levels of residues, being four of them with tomatoes residues(5, 10, 15 and 20%) and four with the guava residues (2, 4, 6 and 8%). The experimental period had 63 days, divided in three cycles of 21 days each. The parameters analyzed were: accumulated consumption (kg), egg production (units), ration cost (R$/kg), crude income (R$), feeding cost (R$), markup (R$) and profitability index (%). The levels 5, 10, 15 and 20% of tomato residues in ration, allowed an economy of R$26,00; 53,00; 79,00 and 106,00/ton of ration, respectively, in relation to the reference ration. With 5% inclusion of tomato residues in birds feeding, it has been observed: higher production, less consumption, less feeding cost, higher markup and profitability index. For guava residues the economy per ton of ration was only of R$1,00; 2,00; 4,00 and 5,00/ton for the levels of 2, 4, 6 and 8%, respectively. For the other variables it has not been observed any effect, in such a way, its maximum inclusion can be made, since it has had an oil supplementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Author Biographies

Edney Pereira Silva, Universidade Federeal Rural de Pernambuco

Doutorando em Zootecnia-UNESP/Jaboticabal

Carlos Bôa-Viagem Rabello, Universidade Federeal Rural de Pernambuco

Professor Adjunto, Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Rua Dom Manoel de Medeiros, s/n, 52171-900, Dois Irmãos, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil. Bolsista de Produtividade do CNPq

Wilson Moreira Dutra Júnior, Universidade Federeal Rural de Pernambuco

Professor Adjunto, Departamento de Zootecnia, Universidade Federal Rural de Pernambuco, Rua Dom Manoel de Medeiros, s/n, 52171-900, Dois Irmãos, Recife, Pernambuco, Brasil. Bolsista de Produtividade do CNPq

Riviana Roberta de Souza Loureiro, Universidade Federeal Rural de Pernambuco

Mestre em Zootecnia

Andréa Aparecida de Souza Guimarães, Universidade Federeal Rural de Pernambuco

Mestre em Zootecnia

Michele Bernardino de Lima, Universidade Federeal Rural de Pernambuco

Aluna de graduação em Zootecnia, bolsista do PIBIC/CNPq, DZ/UFRPE

Emmanuele Maria Florêncio de Arruda, Universidade Federeal Rural de Pernambuco

Aluna de graduação em Zootecnia, bolsista do PIBIC/FACEPE, DZ/UFRPE

Rodrigo Barbosa-Lima, UFPB

Doutorando em Zootecnia-UFPB

Published

2009-12-16

Issue

Section

Agribusiness